@jestdotty HAHAHAHAHAHA

Hell yeah! Slack the shit off this day! Deserved!

@JsonBoa I really need it :-(

@asgs yes, provisioning that 3rd shard (or Nth shard) takes a looot (+15mins)
I'd understand it if it was a loaded cluster holding many GBs or TBs of data BUT it is a fucking EMPTY cluster!! I'm still testing the service...

@NeatNerdPrime the answer I needed to hear. Thanks fellow human.

@b2plane With Beanstalk, the developer doesn't need to worry about provisioning, configuring, or deploying resources. They simply upload their application image and let Elastic Beanstalk take care of the rest. ECS, on the other hand, provides more control over the environment.

@tosensei if he's going into ops he better develop some seniority in hating the craft

@b2plane hey man, advice (from a DevOps dude) just put some years of experience bla bla in your CV, during interviews say you're the best in the field, then figure it out and try not to break production, if you do, well, shit happens

at least for me, that worked flawlessly

Too much text, resume to 20 words or less /s

3. Regarding Fargate billing, AWS get your moneis out for having running containers and their size. Not usage.
You use 2 core / 2GB 24x31, you get charged for that.

The target group is the "glue" between the Load Balancer and the ECS tasks. This is a way you make incoming traffic to the LB end up load-balanced in your ECS tasks.

ECS is a container orchestration system.

ECS runs services wich are several replicas of a task. It may scale automatically or not.

Such task is defined in a Task Definition. Things like container image URI, cores and ram, environment variable. Think of it like a docker-compose file. But for ECS.

Since ECS runs containers it needs instances. You can create an autoscaling group of instances with the ECS agent installed so ECS may launch/orchestrate these containers for you OR... forget about managing instances and use "Fargate". Fargate spins up the instances for you, since it's AWS managed you won't see these instances in the EC2 dashboards.

For routing incoming traffic in a load balancer to these ECS tasks you need to associate a Target Group with the ECS tasks. Each ECS tasks spun up will update the task's private IP in the target group. The load balancer should have a rule pointing a condition (like Host:foo.bar.tld) to a target group.

@KDSBest fuck me

@Nanos TIL about Facebook Dating. That product meeting must have been hell of fun xD

Congrats! Now let that sweet moneis come to you!

@tosensei you must have seen some shit...

Shitastic is gonna be my new fancy word. Thank you.

@Voxera Woah! That's amazing, I'm truly happy for you!

Epic XD

I actually came looking for devranters in Galicia. I'm happy you enjoyed el camino. Greetings from a stranger 👋

@Anchor damn man

@fckIE Epic! XD

@jiraTicket oh thank you so much for your username, it gave me a well needed laugh before going to sleep. This feeling has build up I think in my current place. I've lost all joy in the craft. I really liked it in the previous company although I gave too much and ended burned out in the end. Have a nice day/night kind internet stranger.

@electrineer I'd jump to some more relaxed environment but those are paid way less than the ones I've been on for the past 5 years. I really don't want to be working in this field when I'm over 40 (2 years ahead) so I want to earn as much as possible within my capabilities to invest in something else, have a Lean F.I.R.E and at least decide what to do with my free time. Be a baker, dog walker idk, but definitely not staring at code in a screen 12h a day. Or maybe I'll just do this as a hobby like the other comment.

@Oktokolo oohh this hits hard...

And it infuriates me that it is already approved in play store which is only a one time payment of 25€

@piratefox this: https://developer.apple.com/app-sto...

(v) Account Sign-In: If your app doesn’t include significant account-based features, let people use it without a login. 

So...my app core feature is let users save stuff that we enrich with metadata. But is user's stuff. Personal stuff. Why the fuck can't you let me keep my original account required model?

I've explained them this several times yet they insist.@piratefox

@piratefox maybe, could be? Is plain email/password

Oh we are. Everyday a part of us dies in our jobs. We thrive upon the dead bodies pile of our past selves.

A few weeks ago I was looking upon an account expense surge. Damn Route53 internal resolver just "being there" costs like 250 bucks.

Like.. it's a fucking (insert favorite DNS server here) process running. Da fuck is wrong with these people?

In my current company we're enforced to use only AWS services but in my previous one it was a lousy t3.nano ec2 running CoreDNS. Never gave a problem.

This is gold.