13

What's the point of retro if nothing that we're saying should improve is actively being improved and problems being highlighted is constantly being shoved under the rug?

Comments
  • 1
    Eating chips on beanbags. Literally
  • 5
    the point is the ability to pick a very disgruntled expression and voice, tell the scrum master or whatever _exactly this_, then mic drop and leave.
  • 2
    @retoor yeah i play solitaire while everyone else is talking and I'm done dropping my worthless comment lmao. it's a stupid waste of an hour.
  • 2
    @dissolvedgirl I agree. Had some corporate shill tell me about how they love retro. If it's done right so much can get done.

    I'm like, listen, there is literally nothing I'd like to do more than to just get back to work and do what I'm good at.
  • 0
    Is "retro" a framework or a name for legacy code?
  • 1
    @Demolishun sprint retrospection or something to take a retrospective look at what went wrong, good, etc
  • 1
  • 0
    We just jerk off in our retro.

    Nothing gets better. I don’t care.

    Pretty vacant. Out to lunch.
  • 0
    lol retro isn't so bad anymore since I got a gun, now I can do dry fire training for 45 minutes out of the entire hour.
  • 1
    I think the point is to conform to industry standards and feel better about faux-progress.. lmao.

    It's one thing to conform to a methodology verbatim and it's another to adapt it to your own project in creative ways.
Add Comment