Where is the lie?

Well, the statement about AI. But it’s not a lie, it’s just a misunderstanding.

Actually, there are no lies here. Only statements trying to be funny.

Everything is a lie. You just showed subjective point of view of some person with attention disorder that is posting highly acceptable answers in a particular moment in time. But still it’s just the point of view.

I’d say
no code is don’t rewrite this shit all the time
cloud are computers I don’t want to buy
ai is tool for idiots who want to do something in area they don’t know anything
blockchain is distributed agreement
big data is history I don’t care about right now but I might in future or I need it because law enforce me to keep it
smart home is bet on people habits
vr is bigger screen with keeping my head on my pillow
quantum computing is better random number generator
iot is what else I can put into hardware to sell it

and that’s just my point of view and there ar many more because people are different, moreover most of people don’t know and don’t care who this shit fuck face is or who am I and would never know or care

anyways whatever this is it’s not the truth but just a dust in the wind

The ai part completely misses the concept of emergent phenomena. Ifs are just ifs, but if there are trillions of them, they come alive. With his logic, your brain is just molecules that have no special properties when you put a lot of them together in a particular arrangement

@kiki indeed. I would also add that classic ifs are explicit and have a clear intent.
The branches of AI however are implicit and it’s not clear what the purpose or intent of each "if" is. They are small, opaque parts of the big purpose that the training data has provided.
With AI, the ifs are not written to reach a goal, but they are more like the result of the program that reaches the goal.

This dude will never become 10x founder