Curious about AI assisted TDD. Assisted writing of specs and then assisted implementation. Any experience so far? I kind of like the idea but I'm afraid it's like doing TDD with a toddler, helping less than 50% of the time.

It could be good to make a base with the default tests by supplying a few tests upfront and say that you want functions like that. The businesslogic and stuff, i would write those tests myself.

So, it's good for boiler plate imho.

I only generated tests a few times just for fun, didn't use any of that in production .

@retoor AI is good for boilerplate, yes.
But IMO boilerplate should be avoided, not offloaded to AI. The first step to avoid boilerplate is to pick a non-retarded language.

I‘m skeptical if AI would be beneficial in writing specs (for tdd), because it doesn‘t know your specs. Only you know your specs.
I suspect that if you give this task to AI, you‘ll end up with functional, but mostly meaningless generic garbage which is not very useful for you.

@cb219 I've had it generate a decent set of tests by just asking it to write tests for <insert code here>

Will probably need some clean up however

It's a gadget. Write your own shit like an adult faggot

Maybe it would work better the other way around. Write the tests and it will write the spec for you.