FUCK PEOPLE ON STACKOVERFLOW ANSWERING JAVASCRIPT QUESTIONS WITH FUCKIN JQUERY SOLUTIONS! IF I EVER WANT JQUERY I WILL TELL YA!

NOW GTFO AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS!!!

What would you rather have between getting jquery options that you can pass to vanilla js OR condescending assholes telling you that your question does not deserve to exist inside of S.O?

Mimimimimimimimimimi

@zvyn you and me both man, but at least one of em is trying to help

@Alice yes, join the dark side

jQuery is cancer.

(I don't mean to make fun of cancer or something though, you know how I mean it)

@Kimmax Miniminiminiminimini

*FTFY 🤫

$("#your.ass").shove("up");

@Alice @Shardj but why though? There's literally nothing i can do with jQuery that i cannot do with vanilla. Especially with ES6...

That’s like someone asked...

“How do I install a new wiper blade on my car?”

And the response is...

“Totally use duct-tape, fuck the clip”

Like, yeah, you can do it that way but I am not Red Green here buddy!

Anyway, Keep your stick on the ice. If the women don’t find you handsome, they will at least find you handy.

$("#jQuery").fuckOff("slowly").fadeInto("sunset")

@Alice just install a bigass library to do like two things that are easy in vanilla.js

Mmkaynope 😂

@Kimmax https://youtu.be/Iv4x0TC-1Qg
or did you mean something else?

@D3add3d not what I meant but song checks out 😂

Ok while I understand your problem with JQuery and it isn't really necessary at all it makes answers shorter and if you can't figure out how to translate JQuery garble into vanilla JS it's your skill that needs changing.

@n3xus yeah sure... i could look into the specification for example. But thats exactly the reason i use Stackoverflow: i want the answer right now and not after i took a look at how jQuery implements shit... Often i use SO to just get a starting point in the MDN.

Those jQuery answers may be one or two lines shorter but i'd rather want to read those two JS lines instead of crawling specs/blogs/snippets until i get where i could be hours ago.