4
kiki
1y

White people decided to rename female circumcision, a traditional practice that takes place among Khoisan, Nyakyusa and Khoekhoe people, to “female genital mutilation”.

The amount of suffering that white people caused to the Africans is immeasurable. And now, white people decide to export their “culture” to Africa, and to tell African women what they can and cannot do to their own private parts? For those of you who don’t know, it’s women circumcising other women.

Can whites just fuck off for once? Let African people write their own laws on their land, and practice their own culture.

If they choose to go to your country, that’s a different story. But as long as they practice their culture among themselves on their own land, fuck off!

Comments
  • 0
    Coming to the foreign land, enslave the people, policing everything from the language to the religion to genitalia, then patting themselves on the back and calling themselves “strong leaders”. Such a white people thing to do.
  • 3
    And so we have now 'winter events' in our town instead of 'christmas'.

    (I can give you more examples)

    But really it is not always 'white'... All people are racist it looks like.
  • 3
    It's ironic because the same white people can't agree to abolish circumcision, even though the arguments against it are more or less the same.
  • 0
    @Grumm it has nothing to do with racism. Imagine African people coming to your country and circumcising your women. You’ll be furious
  • 1
    @lorentz because it’s so easy to “abolish” “human rights violations” in “less-developed countries” using phosphor bombs in 2024, given you’re not the one who’s gonna live there afterwards.
  • 1
    @tosensei “humanist” people? More like white culture believers and their sympathizers. “Humanism” is a white invention. White people don’t have the monopoly on deciding what is humane and what isn’t, especially on the land that is not their own
  • 4
    Circumsition without a medical requirement is mutilation. You take a perfectly healthy creature and decide that you know better and start cutting parts off. That's not the same thing as "culture". No-circumsition is the default value and some "cultures" and religions simply decided to do something extra, which means the burden of proof is on them to show that It's necessary, which is not Something you should leave at "Well, we just like it this way" because that's how you get oppression, slavery and many other bad ideas like blood sacrifices. We're smart enough to learn and evolve beyond our mistakes and beliefs and we should celebrate that rather than defending "the old ways" under the guise of "culture". At the very least people should have the right to their bodily autonomy and they should be old enough and presented with sufficient data to decide on their own what they want to do with their bodies
  • 0
    @Hazarth it makes sense to me, but it’s not up to you to make rules on the land that is not yours.
  • 0
    The absolute maximum you have the right to do is to support African organizations active in Africa that are run by African people that happen to dislike female circumcision and want it gone from their own culture.
  • 1
    @Hazarth for sure, but that's just an opinion. If "developed" western countries could abolish childhood circumcision, then extending this now-universal consensus to african indigenous cultures would be defensible.
  • 1
    If western civilization can't reach a consensus on this but they attempt to enforce it on foreign countries, then it's not a humanist ideal extended to less developed regions, it's just a stronger country involving a weaker one in its internal confllicts.
  • 0
    @lorentz you see, isn’t it convenient that when Israeli people circumcise their children for religious reasons on their land, it’s antisemitism to call it wrong. But when African people circumcise their children on their land, it’s a different story!
  • 1
    @tosensei It's not the exact same thing, I don't think any two questions between men's and women's sexuality are ever exactly the same thing, there's always at least a cultural difference that we need to consider.

    What I'm saying is that in both cases children are being mutilated for medically dubious benefit, and this is the core counterargument. If this was as sweeping a counterargument as we imagine it to be, it should be enough to ban circumcision in W. Europe.
  • 2
    And furthermore I think the reason that circumcision isn't banned in developed countries is that children's rights aren't nearly as important per social consensus as we imagine them to be, and the sovereignty of the family unit usually takes precedence unless both the cultural context and rights as understood between individuals are against an internal family decision. So when we cast judgment on African countries, the only reason that their practice seems indefensible is that we apply our own cultural context, not just our notion of individual rights, onto the situation.
  • 2
    @jestdotty good point, but I added that one sentence about women doing it to other women just to intercept sexist arguments.
  • 1
    @jestdotty "The secret powers want it that way" is fast becoming my least favourite thought terminating cliche over "It is what it is". Do you really imagine that everyone is secretly vehemently against circumcision? Are you so far up your own ass that you can't imagine having a minority opinion so you must invent a secret council of aliens that supports everything you consider bad?
  • 1
    @lorentz that's her entire life in a nutshell. She's the somewhat calmer, female version of AoK.
  • 0
    @jestdotty that is fair, I misread the tone entirely.
  • 2
    If the only rebuttal to "you shouldn't slice off the clit of your young girls" is "no you don't understand, you're white" you're literal subhumans and shouldn't even be allowed to decide the brand of soda you drink.

    I said what I said.
  • 0
    Also: I, of course, oppose male circumcision. It's a barbaric practice, no matter how you frame it, and should be allowed only for certified medical reasons

    WITH THAT BEING SAID

    If you can't tell the difference between "removing a piece of skin" and "literally choppping off an entire organ", you might want to consult a lawyer and ask your parents for compensation, as you might be genuinely retarded.
  • 1
    I am in favor of cutting body parts in general.

    Fingers, clit, pp, ears, limbs, eyes, doesn't matter, just cut them off.

    Scares makes us stronger
  • 1
    @kiki jews gets the free pass because they've been holocausted and they're not gipsies, homosexuals or communists
  • 0
    @IHateForALiving especially if she drink fanta. German beverage. Disguisting
  • 0
    @IHateForALiving fun fact but skin is technically an organ.
  • 0
    @IHateForALiving who are you to police other people’s genitalia?
  • 0
    @antigermanist thank you technically correct man
  • 1
    @jestdotty any excuse is good I guess...

    @kiki Like here, we have to reduce noice when there is ramadan, to not have bbq's during that time and shit like that... How is that different from one type of people deciding to renamce a tradinional practice into a bad thing ?
  • 1
    @Grumm where is "here" exactly?
  • 1
    @kiki in a small parliamentary constitutional monarchy... A land of free where christian holidays are renamed to a more generic name that fits some other religion, where people burn other's car as a sign of protest for stuff that happens in a totally different country, or when their football team win a random match.
  • 0
    @Grumm idk, ask your politicians.
  • 0
    @jestdotty whatever man, I don't read your comments.
  • 1
    Same with the religion and people who are not white and demand shitty things they weren't happy with in their own country they fled from.

    I would like to ship those complainers to st.Helena or some place simmilar and leave them there to have their own real life PubG or battle royale lifestyle, far from people who just want peaceful life!
  • 1
    @jestdotty It all comes down to spiritual capacity, intellect and few more factors that separated white people as more open to universal truth. People of all races have that capacity but somehow on average whites stands out a bit, just enough to make problems to the handlers. One race is easy to manipulate to do shit, other race is intelligent but too obedient to the system, whites are most unpredictable to them and that's why they want war in Europe again.

    Its a sad thing when you realize and start to notice totalitarian tiptoes every friggin day. Its exhausting and demoralizing, but hey! Happy 2027!
Add Comment