Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
C0D4681386yYou could easily adjust this to:
NPM dependencies
Actual product
Developers
And be a lot more accurate. -
I always install one (and only one) addon in firefox: noscript. A computer and browser without noscript is completely choked with god knows what crappy and bloated js scripts, most is which gives me no benefit at all. Also, by installing noscript I don't need any further adblocker. I love it!
-
@lamka02sk In fact, when you have configured noscript to allow critical scripts from certain sites, it works fairly well. If once in a while you encounter a site which won't work, I just temporarily set to allow all scripts on that particular site. Agreed, it involves some hazzle, but it is SO worth it!
-
@stormwise and half of the web suddenly does not work :D
The last project I worked on you would get a blank page without JS -
@bytecode When I get a blank webpage, I just temporarily allow all scripts on that page. If it is a page I use more frequently, I can allow permanently, or just relevant parts. After a while, it works fairly well. And performance is WAY better than with all scripting enabled.
-
Yeah, but look how fucking happy he his. You can also be happy, start using JS today!*
*This is a sponsored comment. -
hitzoR2636y@bytecode And that is how websites shouldn't be done. Doesn't it even hurt google search rankings, since you have no content whatsoever without JS?
-
We have a HUGE website, Java backend, multiple CMS, 3 separate templating engines, horrible architecture, every single change takes at least a week because Java guys need to hack a solution to provide content to templating engine context. It's a nightmare. Currently switching it all to node middleware with javascript ssr templates. Sorry, but in many cases js is just a simpler and/or better solution. Or our backend developers suck :D
-
hitzoR2636y@kargaroth That sounds like you have incompetent backend devs mixed with really old legacy code to me. JS isn't simpler in any way, you can have same simple architecture with every major backend language (PHP, ASP, Java).
-
@hitzoR there is content... an index.html file... but it is a single page app that is made using Vue.js so 🤷
-
hitzoR2636y@bytecode Lemme guess. There is single <div id="app"> in <body> and then just couple of <script> tags.
💦💦💦💦💦💦
joke/meme