Var gf = [];

Damn, are you planning on pushing multiple elements into that array? Daring

@FMashiro awww its just a array 😜

@aato my point, you can give it an unlimited number of objects if you so desire, does this mean that you expect more than one gf? :p

@FMashiro how about
If (gf.length>1)
gf.shift
??
🙃

@aato i like the idea ;) good luck

@FMashiro can you do gf.push("..
?😳

@aato you could but you'd most likely get an error saying "undefined variable"

@FMashiro what is your suggestion then? 😎

@aato probably to just forget it and move on...

Joking aside, you should create a class and instantiate it, I'm pretty sure you can order something from Japan :p

@FMashiro never created class in js till now ... learing from fcc and trying to learn react.js and wish i could do electron and matter

...how about nice laptop, kimono,sake , katana and tiny action figure of my hight and can talk "hadoken"

For me a single bool would do just fine.

@aato dont you mean "can say 'heartbroken'" instead of hadoken?

@FMashiro did i do that??

@FMashiro you sounds feminist .. my rant may not support the idea of polygamy.. it may be representing the real image of society ... oh im talking like a zen now 🙄

@FMashiro sorry if i hurt your feeling

A queue would do just fine. Just have a double check on garbage collection.

@viking8 teach me one , will you ?? ;)

@aato easy, enqueue all candidates, and try-catch the hell out of dequeue :)

Change your language of use, and gfs will come to you. 😁

I think you should use `const` instead of `var`.

"gfs" please, how could we know in another context that it's an array if you don't put that fuckin 's' at the end

grep gf > /dev/null

@sam21s awww your are so mean.. :)

@subhog thank you for suggestion . You opened my eye... 😇

@goofle what would you suggest? 🎙

@viking8 thanks you are my bro .😎

Just dont do
var gf = {};

@FMashiro where are you i m missing your comments already?... comeback 🤔🙄

Var old_gf = [1, 2, 1, 3, ..]
var new_gf = [0, 00, 000 ..]

It's good to keep your options open... (:

@DarkMukke, I agree, it's generally bad practice to objectify women. O.o

@ZaLiTHkA sorry , my bad ... should i delete the rant?? I was following the pop culture ... please dont take it seriously. Personally i respect woman . Wont happen again..

@aato, no no, don't stress.. It was just a joke about the "{}" brackets being an object in JS. :)

Does this post support polygamy?

@salvator this is block of functional pl code ... class and attributes far ahead

@FMashiro came here to be comforting, lol'd instead thank you

@aato Just a tip - when you text a woman and want to build attraction, don't use the emoticons or emojis

@Lel00 $1000... tip thank you man

No problem @aato

Reading this thread and hoping this guy gets laid

@beercoder I know this guy. He gets laid regularly.

This whole thread is amazing 😂