Model without conv2:
"I'm gonna be poor and miserable and barely give you .96 acc after much training."

Model with conv2:
"Ahoi! Look at me score .95 in the first epoch!"


  • 1
    Again I knew it was you
  • 0
    @electrineer so what? 😛
  • 1
    P.S. rant:

    I don't even want to use conv2d. So far I'm testing my luck with conv1d, but I'd like to move to dnn instead. Like, full on FCs.
  • 9
    I love how little of this I understand
  • 3
    @Root lovely, isn't it? :D
  • 1
    Out of curiosity, why get rid of conv2d? I've found it to be extremely efficient for most architectures in practice and it has fast implementations on most devices.
  • 4
    @rootofskynet It is! It means there’s so much more I can learn and understand.
  • 0
    @Root I thought you understood EVERYTHING 😜
  • 1
    @d-fanelli @theKarlisK our empress @Root doesn't need to know everything. she delegates tasks to folks who drink.. and know things.
  • 1
    @RememberMe defeats the purpose. People have done it that way before, and I want to try another thing. Plus it doesn't make sense why conv1 wouldn't do a good job there either. Like, right now it seems like conv2 magic.
  • 0
    @rootofskynet lol I drink and know things too but Queen @Root would never ask me for advice! I’m more like the cheese merchant of devRant, totally not king material lol. Just a peasant with his caravan of smelly gruyere and cheddar lol
Add Comment