Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Rust is indeed quite good.
Haskell is an amazing language, but errors are like "E !=< E of type Set when checking that the expression go f ys has type E", then I'm like "No, you go f*ck ys!"
Well, and PHP has very clear errors. I mean, you can hate the language all you want, the errors and stack traces tend to be very clear. -
And comes Erlang
```
** exception error: interpreted function with arity 1 called with two
``` -
@bittersweet but no line number. This is common parameters problem. But when declare it tells you that some shit is happening there.
e.g.
[error] 4108- fatal: :unexpected_end -
Kyu9619354yC errors are fine if you use clang. C++ however, can be pretty shitty, especially when its linker errors
-
LaTeX error messages anyone?
You can consider yourself lucky if the error is at least near your actual error -
Does matter how good the error message is, many people will not read it and post screenshot taken via mobile on Facebook and ask for solution.
which language in your opinion has the best error handling tools?
joke/meme