6

Amazon rejected me twice, idiotic people think only dsa people can succeed. I ain't bad at DSA, it's just that I was being interviewed by an idiot who had crammed the problem from LC prior to interviewing. I could also pick a problem from LC which is unsolvable. If he was so brilliant why didn't he invent one algorithm of his one and rather use solutions by using other's algorithm(like Dijkstra). Absolute Idiots being manufactured. I may not be good, but I accept that. These idiots think coding from other's soln makes them brilliant.

Comments
  • 1
    Your username is 👌.
    Welcome!
  • 2
    I wish they had better Interviewing Techniques
  • 2
    Can you test anyone's actual capability in 45 minutes? They need some mechanism, even though it's useless.
  • 3
    Why would you want to work for Amazon anyway? 🤔
  • 1
    @nibor Because of the FAANG title and society esp LinkedIn folks make me feel like a loser to not get into FAANG.
  • 2
    @theabbie I Don't agree. We have so many good programmers in FAANG companies(they think so), that by now the highly intellectual people interviewing should have devised an Efficient Algorithm to select best candidate in O(1) right ?
  • 0
    @hackerchacha Bruh, your friends sound incredible, I'm sorry :/
  • 1
    That can be, an idiot working in amazon? No, I can't believe it, I won't.
  • 0
    @hackerchacha i haven't worked for FAANG, but FAANG are our customers, is that better or worse than working for FAANG?
  • 0
    @hackerchacha bruh fuck linkedin and society
    Get a remote job that pays in dollars (assuming you are indian) you'll be paid 30-50 LPA (non CTC annual payment)
  • 0
    To be fair, Dijkstra has a scalability problem.

    A* is fine for small tasks (Like video games or personal GPS) but fails at large scale (yep, Amazon).

    The CURRENT and almost not explored field is Quantum computers and research into cost function optimizations.

    So maybe they wanted you to propose them that.
Add Comment