11

Finnegan | devRant Clone

Tech stack: Python, aiohttp.

Some of the rants from devRant were taken.

It took her 8 hours.

Finnegan supports: signing up, logging in, ranting, commenting.

Demo: https://2149-2a02-a420-28-a787-9-3da3-b9be-9dba.ngrok-free.app/...

Source code: https://github.com/retoor1337/...

---

🔄 Reposted from https://kbin.melroy.org/m/drbboard/...

🗳️ Vote in the comments!

Comments
  • 2
    Support the work of @retoor by leaving your feedback and making a vote right in this rant!

    As long as you follow devRant Community Rules and your comment contains anything *approving* or about the *points*, I will interpret it and confirm exact amount of points that you give with the vote. You can give a correction by commenting again.

    Vote can give minimum of 1 and maximum of 5 points per one criteria. Fractional points are rounded down to natural number.

    Please be discrete about the criteria you are voting on: Presentation, Functionality, or both. Implicit criteria is both (net maximum 10 points). Custom criteria will not be accepted.

    Implicitly approving vote is 3 points. Implicitly disapproving vote is 1 point.

    EDITING OR DELETING COMMENT RENDERS THE ATTACHED VOTE NULL AND VOID - BETTER LEAVE ANOTHER ONE.

    In the finishing vote made by me, only the latest confirmed vote is accounted per user.

    Votes must be submitted before 12:00 UTC, 8th of December.
  • 6
    Vote for me cause I wrote my own backend :)
  • 1
    I vote 10 points for retoor
  • 1
    i like backends hihi. so thats a vote from me!
  • 2
    you get my vote because this entry is more aesthetically pleasing
  • 0
  • 0
    @cafecortado ✅ Confirming vote: 5/5 for Presentation, 5/5 for Functionality.
  • 0
    @joewilliams007 ✅ Confirming vote: 3/5 for Functionality.
  • 0
    @sleepyObjobjobj ✅ Confirming vote: 3/5 for Presentation.
  • 0
    @kiki ✅ Confirming vote: 3/5 for Presentation.
  • 3
    Why does the github link still not work :(
  • 3
    Sorry sid, but retoor won this one for me :/
    Sids github link works at least, but the readme is only the default laravel readme and no demo site :/
  • 1
    I have None++ yay
  • 3
    Pretty sus that your github user just does not exist 👀
  • 1
    @j0n4s GitHub shadow-banned her or some shit, so the link never works. :( I don't understand these shenanigans.
  • 1
    Presentation 5, functionality 4
  • 0
    @asgs ✅ Confirming vote: 5/5 for Presentation, 4/5 for Functionality.
  • 0
    This definitely wins imo... and i thought this before sid went off the deep end cuz he projected some serious emotional insecurity at an if statement.

    Im aware its late... but hey, still valid

    Reasons:

    Basic readability. Colour/design

    Knowing what a back-end is.

    Apparently more maintainable.

    Not using a bloat framework as poorly.

    Basic code habits of the creator (i checked a couple files on sids public shit... he posts copy/pasted crap that doesn't even close a basic php tag... that shit gets dangerous)
Add Comment