@meowijuanas I'm sorry to hear you have to deal with this all on your own, but we all believe in your abilities! You should too!

Just try to fix every problem calmly, one by one as if it were a game. I can't give you any more specific advice, other than to try to encourage you not to give up!

@meowijuanas There's always "put it all in a container and roll" approach? A simulation inside a simulation of sorts

That's a bit on the fun side...
Here's my 2 cents:
People, humans are made to adapt. We couldn't have survived without this ability. You don't have a thousand options - you either take a rest and try to grasp the underlying concepts, or you say "fuck it" and search for a workaround (usually quite easy but not performant.

When _I_ get stuck in a loophole of stuff I don't quite get, I drop everything and try to build something simple that has the same problem in essence. What you get is the solution. Then you apply and hope for the best!

lazydocker? https://github.com/jesseduffield/...
lazydocker/README.md at master · jesseduffield/lazydocker ...

@wowotek Depends on your infastructure

Azure

Electro Swing

Your pussy is very cute!

More devs wouldn't just mean lower salaries, but less work too

Yet, the plane can go further distances in shorter time and drives itself (off of your shitty bash scripts) 80% of the flight.

And before anyone asks, it's Razor syntax... That's right - I'm writing inline baby

@iSwimInTheC What exactly don't you like about it? It has good DI, Server side rendering (with razor and soon with razor components), awesome documentation, great support and very very very perfomant!

@gitlog That was a long time ago... I guess Unix Timestamp? https://www.unixtimestamp.com/

You can just delete the old migration if it's a merge conflict

You get used to it. Building backend for 3 years now having started with simple HTML pages with shitty css and js I'd say I'm pretty good at CSS.
It isn't that hard. Obviously code execution is way different and some code is more important than other, but it's not something to be afraid of

@Azer0s It wasn't 30 minutes, it was 5. And I missed my bus because of it 😂

@Azer0s We're working on it...

YES!
I had 4 services doing basically the same thing - pulling out an entity from a database or saving it.
I split entities into groups by their properties (taggable, authored, stored (on disk, not the database))
I then wrote a big generic service that took care of most of the work that was repetitive.

I then decided to make blobs authored. I'd have to copy paste from other services, write exception cases... ~30 lines + 1 hour
Me using the generic class - 2 lines (a one-liner split because it was too long) + 1 minute (not counting tests)

I've also had a null exception as I was presetting some entities where the fix would be to literally just switch 2 lines!

If you can implement a feature in just a line, it's probably because your codebase is bloated or you have repetition. In my case different services are OK with doing the same work but on their own databases.

Fixing a bug in a line or two is either just a silly mistake or a a very interesting solution backed by lots of math.

@meowijuanas Don't worry, everybody hates frontend

position: sticky?

We'll see what happens in Avengers Endgame.
Maybe the GPU cores process all the information and compression it in the cache?

A

@dmoa see a 4 bit computer can add and subtract 4 bit numbers. A real computer usually runs 32 or 64 bit operations. Space is also limited. It's not impossible, but it's like saying "Make AI that won't destroy humanity" to a binary search algorithm.

@filthyranter I also won't accept anyone as a developer if he can't FizzBuzz. There is another side, though.
I have a classmate who went to a coding competition. I thought of it as simple algorithms, but they turned out to be quite hard, when I tried them. The thing is he can't do any software architecture, so when a teacher asked him to do a site with a nice backend, he had to decline the offer.

If you can't build anything useful, why bother learning algorithms. They are the backbone of everything, but in reality you sell a product, not an algorithm. People will sometimes be more amazed by simple useful apps/sites/products, than complicated and very powerful, but not quite useful apps/sites/products.

@Yamakuzure If you haven't committed, try
git stash
git pull
git stash pop

@Yamakuzure You're not too harsh, I've also considered it can be a bit slow.
My idea is to allow people develop new algorithms, while still using the neurons and layers idea of the neural network. For example instead of doing ax+b (a is a weight and b is a bias) we can do mx^2 + nx + b (m and n are weights and b is a bias)

I had that idea (x^2) half an year ago, so I had decided to built a generic NN library. My goal for 2019 is to do it the right way (I tried once but my tests, the code and everything was terrible)

I don't need it to be extremely fast because people would be writing proofs of concept and then maybe write their own faster implementation.

@-ANGRY-CLIENT- I have no problem with people who use python. I dislike people who only "learn" python because of NN libraries. Python is not the fastest language. But if you're a CPP programmer you are hardcore enough to write your own NN.

There are plenty of JS and Java libraries. That's why I'm building my customizable nn in C# (ML.NET is not cool for neural networks)

@devTea I might have overreacted. I'm sorry

@sergiolarosa89 Like 1337 h4x0r script kiddies, but for python users who can't code but use the language for ML

Array has . Length and List has .Count
But they both have a .Count(predicate<object>) method
It's weird but you get used to it

A Dvorak? Who even uses Dvorak these days?