Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
devTea14665124dI’m sorry I don’t really grasp the context, I have been reading over and over again, but I just can’t catch it
JoshBent23946124d@devTea I think I understood it: OP was in a group project and was faster to do things (previous knowledge?), so he could watch TV, when the results came in, OP got a better rating than his partner, so the partner went to the teacher to complain about how OP was watching TV, to which the teacher replied - probably knowing that OP did a better job than his partner - that some can watch TV while getting things done, while other's with how they perform, can't.
Root35449124dYou should be graded on your skills and ability.
Not your dedication and quantity of effort.
If it takes someone hundreds of times longer to produce barely-functioning code, they should not receive a grade equal to someone who can finish the same project in ten minutes, with significantly higher code quality, while thinking about what to have for lunch.
Stories attached to results do not.
Your Job Suck?
Take a quick quiz from Triplebyte to skip the job search hassles and jump to final interviews at hot tech firms
Get a Better Job