70
Comments
  • 2
    Is it a bad thing or not?
  • 7
    @Gregozor2121 It's just a more accurate indicator. So good I guess.
  • 7
    @BigBoo @Gregozor2121 it's a bad thing because it isn't the rumoured red background, it's good because it'll give a more clear indicator, if e.g. the shop is secure or not, which I still see too many shops not having implemented.
  • 5
    @JoshBent Well, according to PCIDSS. If they handle credit cards without SSL they are liable for damages. So. Gg their business as soon as they get hit with fraud lol.
  • 1
    @BigBoo especially chinese shops do it and I doubt they care, because they are pretty much immune, if it's not a massive lawsuit and also not represented by a chinese claimant.
  • 3
    This is good.

    Fuck sites who dont support and dont update their shit to the latest TLS standard.
  • 7
    My school (where I was supposed to learn/get certificate of networking & security, go figure) kicked me out of their crappy Moodle site for reporting their lack of TLS, because I "h3xx0red their servers"... Kinda curious whether they'll now kick out Chrome as well to be honest 🙃
Add Comment