78
retnikt
15d

Clearly Mozilla is the villain here for prioritising privacy and personal freedom over censorship, control, and surveillance. Oh, our parental controls don't work! WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN! wtf

Comments
  • 7
    Wasn‘t it even the case in the UK that porn is blocked by default on ISP level and you needed to specifically opt in?
  • 3
    Hahaha those twats in the UK. Go drink some more tea you fucking Nancy’s.
  • 2
    @possum I heard about that, but it's definitely not UK, but Rhode Island I think
  • 21
    "Yes hello, I'd like to enable Granny Midget Amputee porn on my internet connection. What was that? Yes, it's for my son. I'm calling on his behalf"
  • 2
    Why?? Doesn't firefox provide parental controls on it's own? Whats their problem?
  • 0
    Mozilla is shit anyways, they already do censorship
  • 3
    @gathurian thanks dad!
  • 0
    You can still have it

    You need to add your ISP's key to your network as trusted

    Also, you have parental control in Firefox or maybe take control in your hand by setting up your own proxy(or ask ISP to do so which will basically mean the same thing as first)
  • 0
    They are doing something very good by giving DoH for all and in all ways
  • 0
    Oh and as if no one knows about VPN....
  • 2
    Im more against this idea because DNS is a system level setting and ought to be respected, rather than each app being a special snowflake.
  • 1
    privacy is a relict of the past.
  • 0
    @Karunamon if it's not being implemented at the system level, I'd argue that it's okay. IIRC DNS over http isn't standard in any major consumer OS
  • 2
    "Let's have a contest that will shame people openly; that'll get us some GREAT PR!" - these asshats
  • 1
    Oh no, did this request come from GCHQ?
Your Job Suck?
Get a Better Job
Add Comment