To the people that mistake i and j in nested loops: Have you considered giving these different names?

like k and l? Great idea! I've never thought of that.

Thanks!

@netikras Anything not similar at least, yes.

It's been awhile since I've written a for loop. I've sort of arrived a point where if I have occasion to use one, it's because I'm probably not processing my data properly.

There's also the option to use a font that gives these a different look.

Foreach() anyone?

I rarely stumble upon a need to use for loops anymore, unless I need to track index/keys

What the fuck is a loop nigga just (0 to 10).zip(0 to 10), dont be a fucking cretin, a mumbling idiot, a fool.

Wait what, those can be renamed?

Always preferred i and !

when i need a nested loop im prob doing something wrong... or math at which point i made a mistake already anyways

@C0D4 @kleopi Grid operations?

@Lor-inc if they cant be avoided by streams or matrix-calculations, yeah probably. in that case i use x y z as variables usually, or row column

I once worked on a codebase that had i and j as fields as well as local variables used in said loops, and they were being used to hold the values of (local) i and j at various weird points.

Could've written a programming puzzles book with that guy's code.

use "I" and "l" for more clarity
(capital i and lower case L)

it's even funnier when using "or" statements

if I || l:
print("much clear")

@kescherRant no way!!! i and j in programming are the same as Alice and Me in networks :/

@SortOfTested depends on the language, doesn't it?

@Emphiliis
Not really, no :)

bold of you to assume that I wouldn't fuck up just as bad with clear variable names.

@Lor-inc
Rows/columns instead of i / j

Keeps things legible.