Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
stop68025yWeird binary magic and requirements like browserversion, locally installed libs and bugs.
-
@C0D4 I only did categorical ones, eg. users registered with a freemail email account (a terrible local provider that occasionally makes room by deleting archives or accounts altogether) had a lower priority on all account related operations, and IE users got a separate "compatibility" CSS file that was pretty much empty except for a minimal layout. (I still often do that, once supporting a browser becomes a hassle I add it to compatibility mode.
-
User with non visible character data...
Add eg to the login name tabs / non printable character data
Most people don't sanitize / validate input -
Obfuscated indirection. Create an corner case, add a few methods that make sense, but don't account for the corner. Ensure that the user's account hits that corner case. If possible make it somewhat random so it's difficult to replicate even with the user's data. Personal favorite of mine is to rely on some particular encoding that enables targeting via mostly unique combinatorials across n functions (usr prefixing, role targetting, generic attribute extensions, etc).
-
ddephor44465y
-
sleek34485yWhat i do is set their account to go to testing instances and screw shit up there for them
How do I add bugs that only affect one user and make it look like an accident?
question