A continuation to https://devrant.com/rants/2629107/...

Again the idea is bird/flock of birds.

Thanks to all the people who gave their opinion last time around.

I think 5 has a nice touch with those two "small birds".

@kescherRant I'm quite partial to 5 as well.

5, but I'd shrink the big bird a bit off the edges or show the tips of the wings on the outside.

Yes, go with 5. I belive everyone else would agree to the same.

#4 reminds me of batman logo

I think those birds are a bit too small in 5, the rest are too unsymmetrical. I like 4 the best tbh. It's simple and easily recognizable.

It reminds me of boobs (when laying on back).
I think it's a smart move to use "birds" as a cover if you want to have boobs as your company/product logo.

@Marl3x True, but as my sister pointed out: Mazda...

Also, fixing the symmetry is hard, but it definitely looks bad...

@netikras Should I be offended :D?

@rutee07 I'm gonna have to figure out how to un-butt-ify this before I make it official...

@chabad360 Only if you want to :)

This logos and how the birds drawn reminds me of no step on snek lmao

No offense though, it’s just me. Number 2 logo is the best imo

Maybe on #5 push the butt/bird a bit further back and give it the blue background.

I like the big small in 5,
Like the rounded square and tips of wings from 3.

I’d try 5 with tips of wings, small birds a subtle tiny bit bigger and the border bolder (as bold as the tiny birds then will be)
They I’d try the square with round corners.
Also, I like the un-symmetry of the small birds. Maybe that could be some more. Maybe some golden radio.

Finally, I think showing the wings of the big bird will un-butt-ify the icon.

What’s the use anyway ? General company logo? Or Icons to click on? App-logo ?

I was going to go with @C0D4's idea with 5 (and reduce the bird size a little), but I have to say, @netikras convinced me with his boobs (might also be the girly hair he's been growing lately).

I like #1, but a combination of #3 and #5 would probably look good

None of them.
Too thin

1-3 look like someone typed the 🐦emoji in Comic Sans.

4 is nice and simple, but some people will see boobs instead of bird.

I would iterate on 5. Maybe make all the lines a bit more bold, and scale the small birds to a geometric ratio of the bigger bird. Eyes & brains love "correct geometry".

Also: I would not include the circle outline, just the shape(s) of the birds.

I would also make the background transparent (png or preferably, svg), so the logo is easy to use on various backgrounds -- with both a light and dark version.

Also look up brand guidelines from companies with a good visual language, like Twitter:

https://about.twitter.com/en_us/...

They think about things like:

"from which shapes is the logo constructed"

"If the logo must be placed in a square or circle, how is the margin defined"

"what should the logo look like when printed in grayscale"

5, but shrink the big one some and move it offcenter to the left

5