Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@aki237 easy, simple mistake. When used in the context of "sudo" it does take the form "super user". It's just similar but not directly related commands.
Also, "super user do" is more of a command directive, rather than a grammatical statement. That's likely why, IMHO -
@aki237 welp, these came from the online man page references for su and sudo, as well as the history of sudo... If you want to be trite about semantics, there you go. ❤️
-
@aki237 no disagreement. You got pretty adamant about people "not knowing their shit" and to RTFMP. Well, there it is. Semantics aside - It's all the same thing. Now let's all agree to hope such power never falls into the wrong hands.
-
Orionss28868y@Letmecode Thank you, now I understand :p (you'd guess I'm not a native English speaker ^^)
Related Rants
-
gururaju56*Now that's what I call a Hacker* MOTHER OF ALL AUTOMATIONS This seems a long post. but you will definitely ...
-
linuxxx70This guy at my last internship. A windows fanboy to the fucking max! He was saying how he'd never use anythi...
-
creedasaurus62Another dev on my team just got a new machine. Before he came in today I made two separate USB installers and ...
If "su" means "super user", "sudo" should be "sudoes" nop?
undefined
grammar
sudo
linux