How dense must you be, to check-in files without differences to the source controll?! After being told at least 3 times politely and 4 times >>being screamed at<< to never ever fucking do that again?!

@octogato Well for TFS I know it lets you shoot yourself in the knee with a cannonball if you really really wish to.. So in this case you can 'checkout for edit files' that you wanna change and later lets you check them in..it doesn't care if you're an idiot & don't check for changes yourself if you set it up that way. You told it 'I know what I'm doing' with that, so it lets you do just that... and later laughs about it.. Then even later when I am debugging totally 'unrelated' bug I yell & rant about it..

@octogato Well.. it's actually cool. I still don't know how good/bad is it with branches and merging compared to git, but the simplest checkin chackout are simple & great.. that is, if you are not an idiot who just clicks everything before reading..

@sladuled like you mentioned, it really depends on how the TFS admin sets it up..thinking all developers know what they are doing is a recipe for such disasters..TFS isnt that terrible if used right, git is git always ahead :)

@bondman Agreed, but sadly, noone knows who manages it.. I just wait the day suddenly the server is offline & hell breaks loose xD

@sladuled ah the land of noone knows who does what..been there.. you have my sympathy