Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API

From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@Lensflare @donkulator MSFT at least had attention-to-detail n a Design Language that made Windows uniquely Windows (how good/bad it performed, is a diff discussion)
Nothing in today's MSFT looks like it was made with even an ounce of love or passion
Win11 is larping OSX and failing
Fluent UI is somehow more horrible than Material
Windows doesnt know what its primary App SDK is. UWP, Win32, WindowsAppSDK, WPF, somehow everything exists simultaneously n still gets mogged by Electron
Surface for consumers is pretty much dead (specially with Panos leaving)
IE-Edge gave up Trident-Chakra to use Chromium n be google's bitch
they're making money in B2B but dont give a fuck about consumer facing products now. And as someone who LOVED Microsoft, it's disheartening. -
@azuredivay I was one of those suckers who had a Windows Phone lol.
Everything you say is true but 90s MS had different issues. MS was always bad, just different bad. -
retoor82482d@BordedDev the windows phone was great, the windows mobile was better to develop for. Development for windows phone was so fucked up. I think it's part why it failed.
-
@retoor development for windows phone wasn’t that bad, compared to android and ios, tbh.
-
retoor82481d@Lensflare no no no no. They introduced weird gui stuff in windows phon
E with xml and shit. -
@retoor xml has always been the main ui layout language after the WinForms era.
In WPF, UWP and I think MAUI too.
Also Silverlight, IIRC.
Xml is optional though, so you could write plain C# if you wanted.
Edit: forgot about Xamarin Forms, which was also XML/C# -
retoor82481d@Lensflare anyway, I did quit development for it when windows phone came. I just didn't like it at all.
Fuck modern Microsoft.
rant