We really need to get rid of 96% of the population to actually start living in harmony with our ecosystem.

Even Hitler and Stalin wanted to "get rid of" less people. Congrats, you deserve an award.

I think it's more like 100%

Yes

yeah. start with yourself.

Exactly. The issue with Stalin is that he didn't kill enough right-wingers.

You take the political spectrum, half it, half it again, half it a third and a fourth time and you really get to the revolutionary core.

@sidthepajfuk

You know you'd definitely get killed correct?

@antigermanist the revolution eats its children as we say

@Tounai children are delicious

@tosensei 100% agree to that.

People over average is good, there's proof of that anyware around you. Things that are bad is called inhumane for a reason. Human is good. There's a whole book about it complimenting that.

You know sudpajfuck, we all think that everyone is a bit like yourself. If your self image is bad, the rest of the world is too.

The world is full of happy stuff, open your eyes.

@retoor what are you on about?

Getting rid of 96% of the population is for the GREATER GOOD. I'm not saying this because I hate humanity or because I'm evil or something.

We're destroying our planet every single second. You want every single human to consume and consume and consume? Everyone should eat grass fed steak and healthy vegetables? Do you know how many livestock we need to feed all these parasitic fucking people? We are the viruses.

Our planet is dying.

@sidthepajfuk we dont need to kill people

Just the subhumans who have cars

@retoor

> People over average is good

no.

people, on average, are shit. need proof? pick up _any_ history book.

but people, on average, like to BELIEVE that people, on average, are good. that's why they're trying to bend the language in a way that reflects their wishful thinking.

and yeah - the world is full of happy stuff. but most of it doesn't involve "average" people. or any people at all.

The planet isn't alive, so it can't be dying. The planet has survived asteroid strikes, ice ages, super volcano eruptions, and all kinds of other things. We aren't destroying it.

The only thing dumber than anthropomorphizing the planet is suggesting people should die because of it.

That said, by all means be the change you want to see in the world and off yourself.

@tosensei why not killii yourself? I would've with such image of the world. Orr are you too weak! Do it!

Damn dude. Ugh.

@sidthepajfuk the planet is doing fine young man. You just have to learn how to handle certain information.

falling right into globalist lizard green energy depopulation cult there... sigh

@sidthepajfuk our planet is not dying

you have no idea how the ecosystem or evolution works

you're listening to a cult

@NotJeckel

> The planet isn't alive, so it can't be dying

Wow you're one literal autistic downie. I'm talking in terms of nature, without mother nature we can't exist.

Why don't you fuck off to Mars?

@jestdotty It's economics 101.

Resources are finite.

Human wants are infinite.

We have finite resources but we have 8 billion people and growing. Can you imagine life with 15 billion? How much waste will we produce?

Let's take philosophy aside, do you think life would be so much better with overall population of 600 million OR 15 billion? There is a massive difference. We don't have to cause cancer in various ways, or sabotage people's food and vaccines. We can actually start thriving as species.

https://overshoot.footprintnetwork.org/...

@sidthepajfuk you literally got no clue on economics: https://youtube.com/watch/...

most people don't. even the ones who sit and twiddle the economic knobs (they're chosen for that purpose)

that book goes into the fallacy of war btw, which will cover your finite resource argument

---

also vaccines are not even a real thing. I got fucked by one and looked into it and it's literally just depopulation and has absolutely no basis in science and never did. even in their own theory they wouldn't be making vaccines as they did originally -- so their narrative about vaccines changing every time you ask is actually.. well today I found out it happened in even 1930s. they aren't saying real things and never did, them changing their narrative is actually how the narrative _always worked_ which is pretty wild

@jestdotty

You're saying I have no clue about economics then proceed to give me an audio book from 1946? Are you kidding me?

If resources were infinite and everyone was rich, then war wouldn't exist. We're fighting for resources and land.

Earth is overpopulated and it's only getting worse. But your point is that that's okay and I'm clueless? :/

@sidthepajfuk yes. you know very little. older books are a better source of accurate information than modern ones. just like tech info was easier to find on search engines a decade ago

there's a reason for that but it would be a much greater reveal

@jestdotty I'm not talking about people's opinion or mine, or an economist from 1946. Just stating a fact that Earth is too small to sustain billions of people.

I guess to you everything is abstract, you have no idea where your food from your supermarket comes from. You're not even self sustaining, you live and depend on the system yet you talk about the fallacy of it.

@sidthepajfuk I don't remember saying everything is a fallacy

I never liked the people who say fallacy. my brain doesn't think in gotchas but in logical consistencies, and I'm not sure why fallacies catch on as such

and yeah the vaccine is what caused me to look into all this. cuz I got sick. so getting maimed had an upside eventually. was hard to swallow though

@sidthepajfuk to be fair, nature can and will outlive humans in any possible case. the only concerns humans have is surviving themselves

@iiii

Do you know how many animals and plants have humans driven to extinction?

> to be fair, nature can and will outlive humans in any possible case.

How about uranium mining and waste?

@sidthepajfuk it does not matter in the grand scheme. "species" go extinct always: before humans and after them

Even uranium waste, which is tiny amount compared to the size of the world, does not matter. Animals live abundantly in the contaminated and irradiated Chernobyl zone right now, arguably the most radiation contaminated place in the world.

@sidthepajfuk overall, humans can't really do a lot of harm to the world. The most they can do is make the world unsuitable for humans specifically, while most other species will either survive or adapt.

yall should quit warning and go play ball outside

@iiii OK man. I really hope so.

Otherwise we're fucked. We haven't reached interstellar travel yet.

@sidthepajfuk your dick is a twat

@sidthepajfuk there's hope. The yankocide will come and we will murder all the ceoz

@antigermanist

> your dick is a twat

fire is water?

@sidthepajfuk ye the extinction thing is stupid. there's far more extinct species pre humans than after humans. granted AI wants to say we're extincting then faster but that's incorrect -- it's actually surreal we can even find evidence of old species at all. it's easier to find evidence of species that existed if they existed more recently for obvious reasons of them not having decomposed and been destroyed by the elements over millions of years

and this is also with the basis that these retards want to say if humans exist and something goes extinct it was due to humans. differential diagnosis is a thing in medical science where they do a % estimate of something's impact (they ofc don't do that if they poison you tho), but these sick bastards wanna say humans are responsible for everything because we're the globalist death cult's little scapegoats

how to lie with statistics was a great book I hear. never read it but Bill Gates said it was great!

@iiii ye we got fungi that eats radiation now and bacteria that eats plastic

I don't even like plastic but nobody gives you any other option

then they come around and blame us for it. I don't wanna be buying plastic in the first place goddamnit. I prefer things in glass and in wood. fuckers.

and I even buy these things if I have the option despite the government for WHATEVER REASON charging us extra taxes if we do. wtf

like they say the deposit charge is to "encourage recycling". ok that's great. why is it only on glass bottles though, which are not harmful to the environment? lmao what?

as if these people give two shits. it's just to convince you of retarded self destructive shit, and to do absolutely nothing. just a justification to depopulate and make everyone neurotic about things that aren't real

@sidthepajfuk humanity is fucked whatever they do 😂

@sidthepajfuk not all all. This isn't a zen idiom. Your penis is a pussy.

@antigermanist self projection is going bit too graphic there, buddy.

@sidthepajfuk your mouth is a twat.

@sidthepajfuk you're not fooling everyone. Every and to the last one of your orifices are sphincters. Your bellybutton is an anus too

@retoor if you would have, then that rather suggests that _you_ are too weak to bear the reality of the world.

which explains you clinging to your fact-resistant notion of "people are NOT inherently shitty"

@tosensei lol you're certainly giving people a run for their money