Was it really necessary to abbreviate “cumulative” like this...? - devRant

Ranter

Comments

1

LotsOfCaffeine

4600

4y

Source: https://medium.com/ml-everything/...
1

LotsOfCaffeine

4600

4y

@rooter I've done quite a lot of C#, so I'm very much used to long and verbose variable/class/method names
6

ltlian

2217

4y

Agree with preferring long explicit names. Often it makes the code so obvious that comments become superfluous.

My only exception is 'button'. It must always be abbreviated to 'butt'.
0

LotsOfCaffeine

4600

4y

@molaram do synonyms count as abbreviations?
3

AlgoRythm

50979

4y

Give me the cum_rewards daddy
0

sariel

8663

4y

numpy cum rewards? Sign me up!
0

MASTER-ELMO

7

4y

Just rename it to jizz_bucket += jizz
2

melezorus34

3671

4y

@rutee07 should review the code.
1

Demolishun

30735

4y

Come again?

LOL, somebody said they prefer long explicit names rather than this short explicit name. So long beats short, age old tale.
0

NoToJavaScript

4634

4y

Absolutely, wouldnt work without it
0

amoux

275

4y

My first thought is never a cumulative sum. And I usually name it as;
cums = torch.cumsum(x)
1

donuts

23947

4y

That's why u use total... So this must be intentional
1

Root

83000

4y

Pine script does this too. 🙄
0

OmerFlame

4131

4y

Laughed so hard my stomach hurts

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service