People who conduct technical interview, how common it is for you to see people bombed the interview??

Bombed as in awful? Or awesome?

@asgs awful. like totally blank and cannot answer the question

Unless we're using a recruitment agency that actually talks to them to filter out the muppets, I'd say about 90% are utterly incapable of solving problems and don't seem to understand why anyone would want to.

@asgs

You mean this post is not about terrorists?

@aryzor

I had a tooth infection at my last technical interview. My head was blank, it was fun.

@Jabb03 When is the last time you've seen an actual terrorist and not US government's media lies or agents?

it is kind of 50-50 in my experience. Most are able to talk a few things about the stuff they put in their CV. Around half of the candidates can answer basic questions without any lack of clarity. Around 20% can go beyond and probably less than 5% look fully qualified for the job opening

lmao every single time. my problem is they're either so fucking stupid that my cat will probably do better, or so fucking smart that they're obviously overqualified af. Shakespeares and Newtons of software engineering make bad full stack devs. To be involved and motivated, they should be writing compilers and operating systems.