Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@electrineer As per guidelines, technical terms must be german, otherwise english, but documentation must be german (if you even care)
-
This is a very good thing!
Every feature on its own branch, rebase on top of master relatively often.
If large teams of people work on a bigger feature together, it can even be a good idea to create many smaller PRs against the feature branch before merging the larger feature into master. -
@bittersweet True, but then the master wouldn‘t look like _this_.
Everything gets into master. Actually, no. Nothing was commited on master, we work on an never ending branch called „develop“. Yes, we haven’t changed the master to that develop branch.
EDIT: Our team doesn’t know about rebasing, we only merge and have to use the integrated PHPStorm vcs. -
Cybork10475y@010001111 i feel you
We have 4 developers with 81 branches and last week we had a company wide announcement in which they decided to end PRs -
I hate these because they never show activity.... they should reflect last commit time
-
I tend to, uh, forget to delete things on my local that are deleted in the remote.
This is my new favorite thing:
git branch -vv | grep 'origin/.*: gone]' | awk '{print $1}' | xargs git branch -d -
Maer16875yBelieve it or not, I once discovered Ü/Ä/Ö in class names in some dark arcane legacy corner of our codebase.
-
vicary4785yWhoa, a new music game is out?
Worst case scenario you’ll need a factorial of the existing number to merge.
Related Rants
I just wanna show you guys our branches.
rant
branches
project
management
hell
git