When I was in 7th grade, my neighbor (a DoD programmer) challenged me to write a sorting algorithm for a hypothetical super limited environment (he said a satellite). It didn’t have any built-in sorting methods, had very limited memory, slow processor, etc. so I needed to be clever about it.

It took me a few nights before i found a solution he liked. The method I came up with counted the number of occurrences of each number in the array and put them in the appropriate spots in a new array. This way it only required O(2n) running time and 2n memory.

I just learned today that this is called the “counting sort” 😄

I’m proud of little 11 year old me.

> Root struggles with her ticket
> Boss struggles too
> Also: random thoughts about this job

I've been sick lately, and it's the kind of sick where I'm exhausted all day, every day (infuriatingly, except at night). While tired, I can't think, so I can't really work, but I'm during my probationary period at work, so I've still been doing my best -- which, honestly, is pretty shit right now.

My current project involves legal agreements, and changing agent authorization methods (written, telephone recording, or letting the user click a link). Each of these, and depending on the type of transaction, requires a different legal agreement. And the logic and structure surrounding these is intricate and confusing to follow. I've been struggling through this and the project's ever-expanding scope for weeks, and specifically the agreements logic for the past few days. I've felt embarrassed and guilty for making so little progress, and that (and a bunch of other things) are making me depressed.

Today, I finally gave up and asked my boss for help. We had an hour and a half call where we worked through it together (at 6pm...). Despite having written quite a bit of the code and tests, he was often saying things like "How is this not working? This doesn't make any sense." So I don't feel quite so bad now.

I knew the code was complex and sprawling and unintuitive, but seeing one of its authors struggling too was really cathartic.

On an unrelated note, I asked the most senior dev (a Macintosh Lisa dev) why everything was using strings instead of symbols (in Rails) since symbols are much faster. That got him looking into the benchmarks, and he found that symbols are about twice as fast (for his minimal test, anyway), and he suggested we switch to those. His word is gold; mine is ignorable. kind of annoying. but anyway, he further went into optimizing the lookup of a giant array of strings, and discovered bsearch. (it's a divide-and-conquer lookup). and here I am wondering why they didn't implement it that way to begin with. 🙄

I don't think I'm learning much here, except how to work with a "mature" codebase. To take a page from @Rutee07, I think "mature" here means the same as in porn: not something you ever want ot see or think about.

I mean, I'm learning other things, too, like how to delegate methods from one model to another, but I have yet to see why you would want to. Every use of it I've explored thus far has just complicated things, like delegating methods on a child of a 1:n relation to the parent. Which child? How does that work? No bloody clue! but it does, somehow, after I copy/pasted a bunch of esoteric legacy bs and fussed with it enough.

I feel like once I get a good grasp of the various payment wrappers, verification/anti-fraud integration, and per-business fraud rules I'll have learned most of what they can offer. Specifically those because I had written a baby version of them at a previous job (Hell), and was trying to architect exactly what this company already has built.

I like a few things about this company. I like my boss. I like the remote work. I like the code reviews. I like the pay. I like the office and some socializing twice a year.

But I don't like the codebase. at all. and I don't have any friends here. My boss is friendly, but he's not a friend. I feel like my last boss (both bosses) were, or could have been if I was more social. But here? I feel alone. I'm assigned work, and my boss is friendly when talking about work, but that's all he's there for. Out of the two female devs I work with, one basically just ignores me, and the other only ever talks about work in ways I can barely understand, and she's a little pushy, and just... really irritating. The "senior" devs (in quotes because they're honestly not amazing) just don't have time, which i understand. but at the same time... i don't have *anyone* to talk to. It really sucks.

I'm not happy here.
I miss my last job.

But the reason I left that one is because this job allows me to move and work remotely. I got a counter-offer from them exactly matching my current job, sans the code reviews. but we haven't moved yet. and if I leave and go back there without having moved, it'll look like i just abandoned them. and that's the last thing I want them to think.

So, I'm stuck here for awhile.
not that it's a bad thing, but i'm feeling overwhelmed and stressed. and it's just not a good fit. but maybe I'll actually start learning things. and I suppose that's also why I took the job.

So, ever onward, I guess.
It would just be nice if I could take some of the happy along with me.

Just spoke with another teams developer. (She's using Java)

Her: so we get a json object from your service, I want an array
Me: well that's not what you said in the specs... And it's not hard since it's just a Map
Her: what Map? It's JSonObject I need an Array
Me: give me the library your using..
Her: here...

I Google the documentation and methods and paste the link and the methods to use:

-length (she also wanted count)
-toJsonArray

This ain't JS, just use the . operator and go thru all the methods' docs... Or learn to use Google

Php array methods, all of them, or should i say hash methods

They should fix them. I mean they should fix placing of callback and subject params, because.
I mean
array_filter(array, callback)
array_map(callback, array)

Or they should make array a object like js

I fucking hate chained methods. Ok, not all of them. Query things like array.where.first... that stuff is ok.

Specially if it's part of the std lib of a lang, which would be probably written by a very competent coder and under scrutiny.
But if you're not that person, chances are you'll produce VASTLY inferior code.

I'm talking about things like:
expect(n).to.be(x).and.not(y)

And the reason I don't like it is because it's all fine and dandy at first.

But once you get to the corner cases, jesus christ, prepare to read some docpages.

You end up reading their entire fucking docs (which are suboptimal sometimes) trying to figure if this fucking dsl can do what you need.

Then you give up and ask in a github issue. And the dev first condescends you and then tells you that the beautiful eden of code he created doesn't let you do what you want.

The corner cases usually involve nesting or some very specific condition, albeit reasonable.

This kind of design is usually present in testing or validation js libraries. And I hate all of those for it.

If you want a modern js testing lib that doesn't suck ass, check avajs. It's as simple as testing should be.

No magic globals, no chaining, zero config. Fuck globals forced by libs.

But my favorite thing about it that is I can put a breakpoint wherever the fuck I want and the debugger stops right fucking there.

Code is basically lines of statements, that's it, and by overusing chaining, by encouraging the grouping of dozens of statements into one, you are preventing me from controlling these statements on MY code.

As an end dev, I only expect complexity increases to come from the problems themselves rather than from needlessly "beautified" apis.

When people create their own shitty dsl, an image comes to my mind of an incoherent rambling man that likes poetry a lot and creates his own martial art, which looks pretty but will get your ass kicked against the most basic styles of fighting.

I fucking hate esoteric code.

Even if I had to execute a list of functions, I'd rather send them in an array instead of being able to chain them because:
a) tree shaking would spare from all the functions i didn't import
b) that's what fucking arrays are for, to contain several things.

This bad style of coding is a result of how low the barrier to code in higher level langs are.

As a language or library gets easier to use you might think that's a positive thing. But at the same time it breeds laziness.

Js has such a low learning curve that it attacts the wrong kind of devs, the lazy, the uninspired, the medium.com reader, the "i just care about my paycheck" ones.

Someone might think that by bashing bad js devs I'm trying to elevate myself.

That'd be extremely stupid. That's like beating a retarded blind man in a game and then saying "look, I'm way better than this retarded blind man".

I'm not on a risky point of view, just take a stroll down npmjs.com. That place is a landfill. Not really npm's fault, in fact their search algorithm is good.

It's just the community.

Every lang has a ratio of competence. Of competent to incompetent devs.

You have the lang devs and most intelligent lib devs at the top. At the bottom you have the bottom.

Well js has a horrible ratio. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that most js devs still consider using import or await the future.

You could say that js improved a lot, that it was way worse beforr. But I hate chaining now, and i hated back then!

On top of this, you have these blog web companies, sucking the "js tutorial" business tit dry, pumping out the most obscenely unprofessional and bar lowering tutorials you can imagine, further capping the average intelligence of most js devs.

And abusing SEO while they're at it, littering the entire web with copy paste content.

University Coding Exam for Specialization Batch:
Q. Write a Program to merge two strings, each can be of at max 25k length.
Wrote the code in C, because fast.
Realized some edge cases don't pass, runtime errors. Proceed on to check the locked code in the Stub. (We only have to write methods, the driver code is pre-written)
Found that the memory for the char Arrays is being allocated dynamically with size 10240.
Rant #1:
Dafuq? What's the point of dynamic Memory Allocation if you're gonna fix it to a certain amount anyway?
Continuing...
Called the Program Incharge, asking him to check the problem and provide a solution. He took 10 minutes to come, meanwhile I wrote the program in Java which cleared all the test cases. <backstory>No University Course on Java yet, learnt it on my own </backstory>
Dude comes, I explain the problem. He asks me to do it in C++ instead coz it uses the string type instead of char array.
I told him that I've already done it in Java.
Him: Do you know Java?

Rant #2:
No you jackass! I did the whole thing in Java without knowing Java, what's wrong with you!

I think I just blew my own mind here.

Look at this:

Class SomeClass
{
_call($functionName, $arguments)
{
return call_user_func(array('SomeClass','uselessMethod'), 'method');
}

method($foo)
{
return new Adapter($foo)->execute($this);
}

uselessMethod()
{
return $this->method(__FUNCTION__);

}

}
so __FUNCTION__ resolves to
Caller:

You can run that code, whether you comment out uselessMethod, or not.

Adapter is a function that looks for what class to call depending on a database value
and execute the call.

So api basically uses a chain call to do stuff like this in controllers, here's how
I call the above:

$someObject = (new Class($object))->uselessMethod()->doSomething()->doSomethingElse();

But like, eventually my code matured to where all those methods in the chain call have the same one line return that calls my adapter to find the logic to run.

So, basically, I can now have a class with headless function calls that calls a directory of other classes, that are all defined in a contract somewhere. So as long as those classes
all adhere to the contract, it will never return an error.

I can't think of any reason to do this, other than my setup, and I have a sneaky feeling,
as dirty as this trick is, that there's a bad reason my code has come to being able to do this.

Maybe wrong strategy pattern from the beginning?

I'm sure it'll come to me like 3 days from now..

If you didn't think NodeJS dependency hell was that bad, you should try sequentially parsing a graph that's stored as an array of nodes and their references, where processing of said nodes forces you to use some async functions that depend on other async functions.

What should have been 20 lines of code written in 30 minutes has turned into 3 hours of horror, reading about babel, realizing that it's just adding more problems without solving one, assessing the effort of modification of async libraries to include sync methods as well, trying out asyncwait, async, and everything else there is, trying to rethink the recursive algorithm, rewriting it several times, cursing and hating myself for not choosing to use Python or .NET Core, screaming senselessly at my wife in a language as familiar to her as Klingon, crying in the bathroom, re-assessing my life choices, thinking whether it was a mistake to dedicate 10 years to this career, maybe I'm just not cut out for it since I can't handle this simple task, watching noose tying tutorials on youtube, thinking about my naked empty RPI that won't connect to the server any time soon.

Seriously. Why is it SO BAD?! Or is it just me?

So I am doing a homework with the language my teacher made. He said we could opt for either Java or Lisaac, but he said the latter would be pretty hardcore. But I feel hardcore is just an understatement, and outside of an absence of documentation on the object methods which makes you look all the way through the library files when you look for one method/object, then another, then another and all, here's a single fact that will express my feelings:
In his language, there are three main types of errors:
* Execution errors: the program crashes when something that shouldn't be possible is attempted (looking for an item in an array that's out of its range) ; ok, I can take those
* Compilation errors: syntax errors, semantic errors, type incompatibility... the classic, ok, I can take those, I'm used to it
* Compiler errors: when the compiler compiles in C, but fails to do so! "Mister, am I allowed to ragequit?"

We bitch about JavaScript a lot, but I have never encountered a language with better out of bounds index handling for its array methods. It does make some projects considerably easier!

As I started learning React, I found the allure of declarative style of programming appealing. I try to avoid maintaining multiple state variables for data that can be derived from the base state itself that's stored in the redux store. It works wonders when I have to change something; as I just need to make changes to one function in the utils folder and that change is implemented across the whole app, rather than change the instances everywhere as was the case when I initially started working on this project after the previous dev left.

But I see myself redefining a lot of computed values everywhere, and if I just try to define them in the root component, I'll end up with a huge list of props being passed to a couple of components. Shifting it to the utils folder helps a bit, but then I find myself defining even the simplest of array filtering methods to the utils folder.

Is this need to define computed values everywhere a trade-off that you need to accept when you write declarative code, or is there a workaround/solution I am missing? As of now, the code-base is much better than how it used to be when they had a literal Java dev work on React with their knowledge of Java patterns being used in a framework that is the polar opposite of OOP, but I still feel like there's room for improvement in this duplication of computed values.

My fucking god!! I swear if i meet the guy who implemented Array.reduce in javascript!! I'll tear his god damn head clean off and stuff it down his throat!!

From the spec: "if the initial value is omitted, the first value of the array is used instead and skipped"

WHO TF THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA!?!!?!

One freaking hour that stuff cost me today RRREEEEEEEEEE

# rm -rf $JAVASCRIPT

Please and thank you!

I wrote my first proper promise today

I'm building a State-driven, ajax fed Order/Invoice creation UI which Sales Reps use to place purchases for customers over the phone. The backend is a mutated PHP OSCommerce catalog which I've been making strides in refactoring towards OOP/eliminating spahgetti code and the need for a massive bootstrapper file which includes a ton of nonsense (I started by isolating the session and several crucial classes dealing with currency, language and the cart)

I'm using raw JS and jquery with copious reorganization.

I like state driven design, so I write all my data objects as classes using a base class with a simple attribute setter, and then extend the class and define it's attributes as an array which is passed to the parent setter in the construct.

I have also populateFromJson method in the parent class which allows me to match the attribute names to database fields in the backend which returns via ajax.

I achieve the state tracking by placing these objects into an array which underscore.js Observe watches, and that triggers methods to update the DOM or other objects.

Sure, I could do this in react but
1) It's in an admin area where the sales reps using it have to use edge/chrome/Firefox
2) I'm still climbing the react learning curve, so I can rapid prototype in jquery faster instead of getting hung up on something I don't understand
3) said admin area already uses jquery anyway
4) I like a challenge

Implementing promises is quickly turning messy jquery ajax calls into neat organized promise based operations that fit into my state tracking paradigm, so all jquery is responsible for is user interaction events.

The big flaw I want to address is that I'm still making html elements as JS strings to generate inputs/fields into the pseudo-forms.

Can anyone point me in the direction of a library or practice that allows me to generate Dom elements in a template-style manner.

JavaScript keeps surprising me, or I'm just rushing. lol

class Group {
#group;

constructor(){
this.group = [];
return this.group;
}

add(item) {
// only if it isn't already a member
// value can be part of set only once
if(!this.has(item)) {
group.push(item);
}
}

has(item){
// return boolean: item member of group
for(let i=0; i<group.length; i++) {
if(group[i] === item) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}

let group = new Group();
group.add(1);
console.log(group);

Error: group.add() is not a function
Why is group.add() not a function?
A.I. analysis:

1. Private field vs public field:
A private field #group can only be accessed as this.#group. But in the constructor, I wrote:
this.group = [];

This creates a new public field, unrelated to #group.

2. Returning from constructor:
return this.group;

In JavaScript, a constructor automatically returns this, which is the instance of the class. Returning this.group replaces the instance with the array. That’s why after new Group(), your variable group is just an array, not an instance of Group. Arrays don’t have the add method — hence the error.

3. Referencing group inside methods:
group.push(item);
Here group is not defined. You probably meant this.group (or this.#group if using the private field).

Note to self: in the magic of computer science, you must be precise. If I loosely define the black box, the result will have a chance of producing anomalies.. kind of like reality. lol

nothing new, just another rant about php...
php, PHP, Php, whatever is written, wherever is piled, I hate this thing, in every stack.

stuff that works only according how php itself is compiled, globals superglobals and turbo-globals everywhere, == is not transitive, comparisons are non-deterministic, ?: is freaking left associative, utility functions that returns sometimes -1, sometimes null, sometimes are void, each with different style of usage and naming, lowercase/under_score/camelCase/PascalCase, numbers are 32bit on 32bit cpus and 64bit on 64bit cpus, a ton of silent failing stuff that doesn't warn you, references are actually aliases, nothing has a determined type except references, abuse of mega-global static vars and funcs, you can cast to int in a language where int doesn't even exists, 25236 ways to import/require/include for every different subcase, @ operator, :: parsed to T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM for no reason in stack traces, you don't know who can throw stuff, fatal errors are sometimes catchable according to nobody knows, closed-over vars are passed as functions unless you use &, functions calls that don't match args signature don't fail, classes are not object and you can refer them only by string name, builtin underlying types cannot be wrapped, subclasses can't override parents' private methods, no overload for equality or ordering, -1 is a valid index for array and doesn't fail, funcs are not data nor objects when clojures instead are objects, there's no way to distinguish between a random string and a function 'reference', php.ini, documentation with comments and flame wars on the side, becomes case sensitive/insensitive according to the filesystem when line break instead is determined according to php.ini, it's freaking sloooooow...

enough. i'm tired of this crap.
it's almost weekend! 🍻

Why is React.js so hard to learn for someone from a JAVA back end background? I'm constantly asking myself "so should I set param as string? or int? Array? so many methods that's returning html tags! what collects all and makes it appear at WHERE??"

WHAT CAN I DO TO RECOVER MY STOLEN BITCOIN? CONSULT MAESTRO ENCRYPTER FINANCIER.
I am overjoyed beyond words to report that I have been truly blessed by the expertise and swift action of Maestro Encrypter Financier in recovering my stolen Bitcoin. The feeling of disbelief transformed into sheer elation when I received the news that my lost Bitcoin had been successfully retrieved in a mere 48 hours. The name Maestro Encrypter Financier had come strongly recommended to me, backed by an array of glowing testimonials that showcased his efficient and reliable services in reclaiming lost cryptocurrencies. It is difficult to express the depth of my gratitude towards Maestro Encrypter Financier as he navigated through the complexities of my situation with precision and expertise that exceeded all my expectations. The fraudulent activities of a deceitful investment organization had caused me to fall victim to losing my Bitcoin; however, the intervention of Maestro Encrypter Financier turned the tide in my favor. Witnessing the determination and dedication with which he pursued the recovery of my funds from the scammers was a true testament to his unwavering commitment to helping those in need. A beacon of hope in the realm of Bitcoin recovery, Maestro Encrypter Financier stands as a testament to integrity and trustworthiness, qualities that are often rare to find in this digital age. I am more than willing to serve as a beacon of hope for others who find themselves in similar predicaments, urging them to seek the assistance of Maestro Encrypter Financier without hesitation. His reputation as a genuine and dependable Bitcoin recovery expert precedes him, and I can attest firsthand to the efficacy of his methods in reclaiming stolen funds. To all those who are grappling with the unsettling experience of losing their hard-earned cryptocurrencies, I implore you to remain steadfast in your pursuit of justice and restitution. Do not lose hope, for an ally in the form of Maestro Encrypter Financier is just a message away, ready to assist you in reclaiming what rightfully belongs to you, no matter where you are in the world and what time of the day it may be.
E-mail : maestroencrypter @ financier . com
whatsApp : +1 472 203 8937
Website : https :// maestro encrypter financier. c o m /

RECLAIM YOUR LOST CRYPTOCURRENCY TODAY WITH TRUSTED EXPERTS - HIRE HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS

The sudden disappearance of your cryptocurrency holdings, whether due to a sophisticated cyberattack, a deceptive scam, or simply misplaced access credentials, can feel like a financial disaster. During these crucial times, HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS  provides the ultimate solution for digital asset restoration, offering unmatched expertise in recovering Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a vast array of altcoins.What sets  HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS unique from the rest is their elite team of blockchain forensic specialists, who combine cutting-edge technology with in-depth investigative methods. These experts utilize advanced cryptographic analysis to thoroughly trace transaction histories across decentralized ledgers, uncovering vulnerabilities and exploiting weaknesses in even the most complicated theft schemes. Their approach goes far beyond basic wallet recovery services, employing proprietary tools to navigate the often murky world of blockchain transactions.The recovery process begins with an in-depth consultation where clients provide essential information about the loss, including transaction records, wallet addresses, and details about the breach or incident. The forensic team then embarks on a multi-faceted investigation, combing through blockchain data across various networks and exchanges to uncover digital traces that might otherwise remain invisible.What truly sets HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS  apart is their strategic and proactive approach to fund retrieval. They don’t simply trace stolen assets, they craft customized recovery plans, collaborating with cryptocurrency exchanges, legal authorities, and even international organizations. Their specialists know exactly when to intercept frozen funds, reconstruct private keys, or employ advanced social engineering tactics to retrieve assets from scammers.Their recovery process is highly detailed, utilizing a range of investigative techniques that leave no stone unturned. Whether dealing with a direct theft, hacking incident, or even accidental loss due to a misplaced private key, HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS  team can step in and provide a targeted, expert solution. In a world where cryptocurrency is often seen as a difficult asset to recover once lost,  HACKATHON TECH SOLUTIONS  ability to navigate the complexities of digital asset recovery gives clients peace of mind that they can recover even the most elusive of funds. When the stakes are high, their specialized expertise to restoring digital assets make them the definitive choice for anyone facing the loss of cryptocurrency holdings.  Their contact details are listed below.

Whatsapp:‪‪‪+31 6 47999256‬‬‬

Telegram: +1(659) 217-9239‬‬‬‬

Email: hackathontech service @ mail . com

ADVANCED HOTEL IPTV SOLUTIONS IN UAE

In the competitive hospitality industry of Dubai and the broader UAE, enhancing guest experiences is paramount. One effective way hotels achieve this is by implementing advanced Hotel IPTV system. These systems not only elevate in-room entertainment but also streamline operations and open new revenue streams.
Understanding Hotel IPTV Systems
Hotel IPTV UAE (Internet Protocol Television) delivers television content over the internet, replacing traditional cable or satellite methods. This technology enables hotels to offer a vast array of TV channels, on-demand content, and interactive services directly to guest rooms. By adopting an IPTV system for hotel, establishments can provide a modern, personalized entertainment experience that meets the expectations of today's tech-savvy travellers.
Benefits of Implementing Hotel IPTV Solutions
1. Enhanced Guest Experience: Hotel IPTV Dubai systems allow guests to access a wide range of television channels and on-demand content. Interactive features such as room service ordering, spa reservations, and local attraction information can be integrated, making the stay more convenient and enjoyable.
2. Personalization and Branding: Hotels can customize the IPTV for hotel interface to reflect their brand identity, displaying personalized welcome messages and tailored content. This not only reinforces branding but also creates a unique and memorable experience for guests.
3. Operational Efficiency: Integrating the IPTV Hotel system with property management systems (PMS) and room controls streamlines operations. Guests can easily access various services, and hotel staff can manage requests more efficiently, leading to improved service delivery.
4. Multilingual Support: Catering to an international clientele, IPTV systems for hotels can support multiple languages, ensuring that guests can navigate the system and access content in their preferred language, thereby enhancing comfort and satisfaction.
5. Revenue Generation: Hotel IPTV solutions offer opportunities for additional revenue through targeted advertising and promotions. Hotels can showcase their amenities, special offers, and local attractions, encouraging guests to utilize on-site services and explore paid content options.
Leading IPTV Solutions for Hotels
In Dubai and the UAE, several reputable IPTV solutions are available for hotels:
• LG Pro:Centric: A comprehensive IPTV platform designed for the hospitality industry, offering interactive services, personalized experiences, and centralized management features. It enables hotels to customize the user interface, offer targeted content and promotions, and integrate seamlessly with various hotel systems.
• Samsung LYNK REACH: Another popular IPTV solution for hotel, providing a range of features tailored to the hospitality sector. It integrates with hotel management systems, offers interactive program guides, personalized welcome messages, targeted content delivery, and remote management capabilities, facilitating efficient system control by hotel staff.
Choosing the Right IPTV Provider
Selecting an experienced and reliable IPTV provider is crucial for successful implementation. Providers like AL IMTEDAD specialize in offering top-tier IPTV system for hotels in Dubai and across the UAE. Their customized solutions feature personalized welcome messages and user interfaces, enhancing the guest experience and improving operational efficiency. By partnering with leading technology brands and offering comprehensive support, they ensure a seamless and advanced television experience for hotel guests.
Conclusion
Implementing a Hotel IPTV system is a strategic move for hotels aiming to enhance guest satisfaction, streamline operations, and increase revenue. By offering personalized, interactive, and high-quality entertainment options, hotels can meet and exceed the expectations of modern travellers, setting themselves apart in the competitive hospitality market of Dubai and the UAE.

BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY, SPECIALIZE IN RECOVERING LOST BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCY

The entire ordeal began rather innocently when I found myself drawn into the enticing world of online investing by an FX trader I encountered on Instagram. At first, this trader struck me as exceptionally professional and self-assured. They shared an array of impressive testimonials, recounting tales of astonishing returns that others had purportedly made from their investments. It was as if they had opened the vault of wealth and were inviting me in. The promises were bold and alluring: invest a relatively modest sum, and I could potentially multiply my investment fivefold in a mere seven days. It felt like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and I couldn't shake the feeling that this was my chance to significantly grow my financial assets.

Initially, all of this seemed perfectly above board. The trader presented what appeared to be concrete proof of their successes, displaying glowing reviews and testimonials from previous clients who had seemingly struck it rich using their methods. Trust began to blossom, and I convinced myself that diving into this venture was not just a good idea but a savvy financial move. With a momentum of excitement and optimism, I made my first investment, gradually increasing my stake over the following weeks until I had funneled a total of $73,000 into this trader's enterprise.

However, as the days turned into weeks, a shadow began to loom over my optimism. Each time I attempted to withdraw my funds or the supposed profits I had amassed, I found myself met with a series of increasingly elaborate excuses. The trader's team concocted a new story each time I inquired about my cash — claims of additional fees, unforeseen taxes, or necessary "security deposits" that had to be paid before I could ever see my hard-earned money again. The first few times, I hesitated. I wanted to believe that these requests were genuine, that there were indeed legitimate hurdles to navigate. Yet, rather than easing my worries, these excuses only deepened my confusion and frustration.

With each additional demand, the trader's team positioned it as though compliance was my only option if I ever wanted to reclaim my money. It felt like a relentless cycle of hope and disappointment. I vividly remember the helplessness that enveloped me; every time I raised my concerns or expressed my doubts, they reassured me—a mix of confidence and false warmth—promising that my funds were just around the corner, pending these final hurdles.

Eventually, as reality settled over me like a cold blanket, I came to a heart-wrenching realization: I had fallen victim to a scam. The vexation and despair left me reeling, and although I felt utterly desperate, I was at a loss as to how to take action and recover my funds. Then, by sheer chance, I stumbled upon a social media post from someone who had gone through a harrowing experience similar to mine. They mentioned a company called BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY, a team of crypto recovery experts dedicated to assisting individuals in retrieving lost funds from fraudulent investment schemes.

My initial inclination was to be doubtful. After all, I had already experienced a deception that left me wary of placing my trust in another entity. Nevertheless, after much contemplation, I resolved to take a leap of faith and reached out to BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY. I provided them with a comprehensive account of my transaction history and the unfortunate details of my case, praying that they could provide a glimmer of hope amidst my frustration. To my astonishment, just seven hours later, they requested my wallet address, indicating they were ready to take action.

What transpired next was nothing short of miraculous: I found $73,000 reappearing in my wallet. The relief and gratitude I felt were beyond words. BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY proved to be nothing like the trader who had initially lured me into this mess. They were consistently professional, impressively prompt, and thoroughly diligent in their work. Their expertise and dedication truly facilitated the recovery of a significant portion of my lost funds.

In light of my experience, I cannot stress enough how crucial it is to look to recovery specialists like BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY if you ever find yourself ensnared in a similar predicament. Their intervention made a profound difference in my case, and I will forever be grateful for their support during such a tumultuous time. If you find yourself in such a challenging situation, I highly recommend seeking help from professionals who understand the complexities of these fraudulent schemes; they can make all the difference in the world. Email them on ( botnetcryptorecovery @ groupmail . c o m )