Interviewing a junior dev.
> Make this function return false.
> junior: deleted all code in function replaces it with return false;

Literally no words.........

!false

men==women returns false

"False Positive" and "False Negative" errors

Bring the funny...

Welcome to JavaScript where
Number.isInteger(0.9999999999999999) is false and
Number.isInteger(0.99999999999999999) is true

Code: if(customer.primaryContract)

Boss: "just using a variable as a boolean isn't very readable"

Me:
if(!(!customer.primaryContract != !true).toString() == 'false')

Q : 1 is true and 0 is false. right??
A : 1

public boolean even( int num ) {
if ( num < 0 )
num = -1 * num;
while ( num > 1 )
num = num - 2;
if ( num == 0 )
return true;
else
return false;
}

This is not false !

[] == []; // false
[] < []; // false
[] > []; // false
[] <= []; // true
[] >= []; // true

When you see a someone write this
if(condition){
return true;
} else {
return false;
}

function isTrueOrFalse(s) {
if (s == true) return true
If (s == false) return false
}

If (condition)
return true
else
return false
😂😂😂

200 OK
{ ok: false, error: "Not found", code: 404 }

!false
It's funny cause it's true 😐

I just encountered this:

switch (boolean) {
case true:
…
break;
case false:
…
break;
}

if( !condition ) vs. if(condition == false)

Pointless debate started with readability, turned into heated insults under 30 seconds 😂

int main()
{
bool NeedPoints = true;
int Points = 0;
if (NeedPoints)
{
Points++;
if (Points > 10)
{
CreateAvatar();
NeedPoints = false;
}
}
}

Q: 0 is false and 1 is true. Right?
A: 1

Me-
/ / / / / / / / /
if (bool == true)
{
bool = false;
}
if (bool == false)
{
bool = true;
}
/ / / / / / / / /

My friend-
/ / / / / / / / /
bool = !bool;
/ / / / / / / / /

*not a real story*

Typical JS
null > 0 //false
null == 0 //false
null >= 0 //true

Wtf?

!false, it's funny because it's true 😂

This was typical for me:

Yesterday evening I was installing a webserver on my Raspberry Pi for experiments with WordPress. I began some days ago, but I had to stop because the downloads took at least to long.

So I started to logi in:

Username: Raspberry
Password: Pi
-> False Password

Wondering why it is not working a tried again. Same result. After some time I remembered that I changed my password.

Username: Raspberry
Password: Ih4G2tgY*
-> false password

*example
Tried again. Still false password. Then I remembered, that I used my another standard password.

Username: Raspberry
Password: U2gra94hY*
-> false password

After that I felt a mix of angry and helplessness. After some other failed attempts I gave up.

I formatted the SD-Card and installed Raspian again.I started my Pi

Username: Raspberry
Password: Pi
-> false password

My thought: WTF, why does this not work!!

This was the moment when I got the brainwave that the Username wasn't Raspberry, it's Pi.

Username: Pi
Password: Raspberry
-> access

Then I hated myself.

Shit fucking noobs

bool x = false;
bool not_x = x ? false : true;

Fucking pro noob shit!

Refactoring legacy code when...

if _out == True:
r = True
elif _out == False:
r = False

return r

Classmate: "why doesn't it work?"
The code:

if (false) {
return even;
} else {
return odd;
}

if (condition == true && condition != false)

True | | False

This rant is False.

#define TRUE false

bool success = false
if !success {
success = try()
}
if !success {
success = try()
}
if !success {
throw new GiveUpException()
}

Why have you not yet approved my PR?!!?!

The PR:

```
role.filter(elem => elem !== "view" ? elem !== "use" ? elem !== "admin" ? false : true : true : true)

not the worst by itself, except I keep finding them everywhere

if(thingThatIsTrue == true) {
// omfg
}

or it's inbred cousin

if(!thingThatIsTrue == false) {
//herpa derp
}

?notFullScreen=false

Today at work while reading legacy code:

do {
...
} while(false)

Wanna cry and laugh at the same time

Where I work, in our database, we use 3 to indicate true and 7 to indicate false and 0 is true but null is false

In another table, we use 'P' to indicate true and 'I' to indicate false and 'Y' is also false and null is false

And the most used table, we also use 'Y' to indicate yes and 'N' to indicate no, but null is also Yes.

We also store integers as varchar in a live table, but stays an integer in all the other tables. I hope I'm not there when the number of digits exceeds the varchar limit.

These are all live and used in production all created by my boss, the head of IT.

Repost from r/programmerHumor

The evilest thing to do in a C++ project:

#define TRUE FALSE

Want to piss off the person reviewing your PR?

don't just return true or false use 1 == 1 for true and 1 == 2 for false.

Watch the glorious rage unfolds 🤘🤘🤘

Me, when read old code:
if z == true
return true
else
return false
Yeah, why not stupid fucker.

Developers who writes something similar

if (count >= 0) { return true; }

else { return false; }

deserves a special room in hell.

if ($id != $product->getId()) {
return false;
}
return false;

What's the point?

someBoolean = (condition1 && condition2 ) ? true : false;

O.M.G....

I hope I can code myself like below.

me.Girlfriend = true;
me.Millionare = true;

but, the real case is

me.Girlfriend = false;
me.Millionare = false;

the sadest case is

me.Girlfriend is not defined T.T

const true = false; 🤔
(from r/ProgrammerHumor)

Came across a fun one today :
Some JS dev using 'false' and 'true' instead of false and true. 😫

False Hope 😑

I can't stand when people use (SomeBoolean == false) instead of (!SomeBoolean)

Why can't Python have a switch case statement???

Also what's with the capitals in True/False?

I have previously seen this in a production code base. The same code base included nested if statements (20+ conditions)...

If (condition == false) {
return false;
} else if (condition == true) {
return true;
}

JavaScript question of the day:
Is NaN equal to itself?

NaN === NaN

A. SyntaxError
B. False
C. True
D. NaN

> 0.5 + 0.1 == 0.6
> true

> 0.1 + 0.2 == 0.3
> false

🙏🙏

console.log(0.47-0.01===0.46);
Output: false :/

That got me stuck for quite a while..

Learned more about floating point arithmetic and representation 😊

Output:
true
false

Why?
This question was asked by my friend, was unanswerable.

Being told that real life experience < school degree.

You couldn't possibly be more fucking wrong.

if (obj == null == false)

Dude, what the fuck is wrong with you?

Kids use "if(condition)"
Men use "if(condition == true)"
Legends use "if((condition == false) == false)"

Took me 2hrs of my life

if (false);
{
// do sth
}

!rant

In firefox:

about:config

In "dom.webnotifications.enabled", change "true" to "false"

Website notifications are now disabled. You're welcome.

while(debug){
coffee++;
if(coffee == OUT){
giveUp();
debug=false;
}
}

bool True = false;
bool False = true;
if (True == true)
{
False = True;
}
else
{
True = true;
False = !true;
}

if (!False == !!true && True == !false)
{
False = True;
True = (!!False)true;
}
Console.WriteLine("Banana");

The alarming rate of false news these days...

The moment you realize your time assessment was wrong again.

Conference tickets are overpriced

true or false?

Do you attend any without being sponsored?

lies...

Oh Docker, why do you give me false hope...

if (variable == true)
return true;
else return false;

So, if i false just correct me to true. But if i true i will be false at the same time. But this is not false.

Thank you devRant algorithm 😂

JavaScript logic:

5 + false + [] is '5'.
5 + [] + false is '5false'

Spent hours trying to figure out why API calls to a third party service weren't working.

Hit up their support and find out the following:

"Hi there, we can only take true and false as strings."

"Uhmm... Does it take anything apart from true or false?"

"No, but they must be sent in as strings"

"Any reason why you don't take booleans if it's just true or false?"

*crickets chirping*

GFG

How to test your cpu cooling system:

Open Firefox
Set option CloseOnLastTab to false
Hit CTRL W and don't let it up

Watch cpu burn.

Just JavaScript things:
alert(typeof NaN); //alerts 'Number' alert(NaN === NaN); //evaluates false
What else would you expect?

Javascript is so funny

"0" == 0 //true
"" == 0 //true
"0" == "" //false

Always remember the ===
Realize this took me an hour of debugging

Ok , so True is just !False

return (this.isBad) ? true: false;

True || False

Your choice. Select one
1.
foo (bar) {
return true;
}

2.
foo (bar)
{
return true;
}

3.
foo (bar) { return true; }

4.
foo (bar)
return true;

5. Collapse
|-------------------|
| foo (bar) ... |
|-------------------|

6.
#define foo boo
#define bar par
#define ( `
#define ) '
#define return go_home
#define true false
#define { ☞
#define } ☜

6-1.
boo `par' ☞
go_home false;
☜

6-2
boo `par'
☞
go_home false;
☜

6-3.
boo `par' ☞ go_home false; ☜

6-4.
boo `par'
go_home false;

6-5.
|--------------------|
| boo (par) ... |
|--------------------|

Select and Comment below.
Or add your own.

Class DonaldTrump extends Shit implements Asshole {
public final boolean PRESIDENT = false;
public final String THINKING = "bullshit";
public void talk () {
System.out.println(THINKING);
}
}

My first login function

const login = (email, password) => {
If (email && password) {
return true
} else {
return false
}
}

devRant taught me that most dev stereotypes are true...and false :))

Am I the only one who's getting more and more aggrevated about how the large youtube channels misinform and make out VPN providers (I am looking at you, Nord VPN, mostly) as the messiahs of the internet? How they protect our data that would otherwise be in incredible "danger" otherwise?

I understand they need clients, and I know most of the YT channels probably do not know better, but... This is misinformation at best, and downright false advertising at the worst...

"But HTTP-only websites still exist!" - yes, but unlike the era before Lets Encrypt, they are a minority. Most of the important webpages are encrypted.

"Someone could MITM their connection and present a fake certificate!" - And have a huge, red warning about the connection being dangerous. If at that point, the user ignores it, I say its their fault.

Seriously... I don't know if Nord gives their partners a script or not... But... I am getting super sick of them. And is the main reason why I made my own VPN at home...

boolean must be true || false || perhaps || schrödinger

If (post.text.contains("Chuck Norris"))
{
post.visible = false;
}

didn't anyone go for the "#define true false" joke? i didn't actually see it in action, but it would be a pretty harsh one.

if (condition){
return true;
} else {
return false;
}

JavaScript:
NaN === NaN // false
Typeof NaN === 'number' // true

Today I found this jewel in a PR of a respected dev of my workplace:
if(conditions)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}

I’ll often open up my console and check if something is true and then check if the opposite is false. Thanks js

if (!isset($woman))
{
$cry = false;
}

When you search for this error during 3 hours

if (false);
{
printf("why u right ?");
}

And it was just the first lines comma

OSC, or open sound protocol, does not have a Boolean type. instead, the Boolean true has type true and the Boolean false has type false.
what.
well.
at least the problem wasn't in my code?

Yet again

If foo():
return True
else:
return False

Agrrr!!11

Midnight thoughts:

Why the opposite of 'true' is 'false'? why not 'eurt'?

return false;

2b || !2b a programmer with a bad sense of humor ?

Lets play a game of spot the bug...

Too easy you say?
What if I told you that this code was written by a well paid dev over an exceptionally large period of time?

Crazy huh, but that's still nothing. The most ludicrous thing about it - is that you (like me) probably suffer from a mild case of impostor syndrome.

I just ended that suffering. The only thing worse than impostor syndrome is believing you actually know what the fuck your doing. Keep it in check but learn to love it... it's probably the reason you could spot the bug after all.

I'm surprised management allows us to write false positive tests just to have high coverage instead of refactoring it first. Time to abandon ship.

$md5 = md5_file($file_uri);
=> Returns false

Mmh...

die(is_readable($file_uri));
=> Returns false

[Mmh intensifies]

if(!is_readable($file_uri)) {
chmod($file_uri, 0777);
}

=> Chmod() returns false

GAAAAH FUCK THIS I CALL IT A DAY

Think of something more retarded than this:

boolean name = (getBoolean()) ? true : false;

#define TRUE FALSE

happy debugging! ! 😈😈😈

Expect the unexpected (false) 😂

while (deadInside)
{
me.drink(coffee);
if (thirstLevel == 0)
{
deadInside = false;
}
}

I wrote this code last month...

def func(is_admin, user):
is_admin = is_admin or False
user = user # so pro much wow
return is_admin ^ user

My man said "What should I return if the True/False field is left blank?"

WHY WOULD A BOOLEAN BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN TRUE OR FALSE???!!!

I'm gonna have an aneurysm. I shouldn't be educating people on best practices for something that's already been written about time and time again. RESTful philosophy has been documented so much, and all it takes is a quick google search, but noooo! I have to take time out of my day as if I'm a regular old stakeholder to explain that I want the exact thing that I sent in an email two weeks ago. Amazing.

Going to make a new programming language, positive# .

Where the default value of a Boolean is true instead of false.

When you debug all day, and at the end only thing that boss sees are 3 line changes in git commit.

I've noticed when I talk to people I use terms like "true" and "false" a lot. Like "Dude that's totally false". "So true!"
#CantHelpIt💻

Fucking give me an error message instead of telling me {error: "You can find more details on developer.incompetent-shits.com", success: false}

I really dislike when people don't use braces { } on if/else statements.

If(almond.harvestStatus == undefined) almond.harvestMode=false
almond.dropdown = false.

This is hilarious

F*cking backend guys that send empty arrays like [ null ] ...

array.length === 0 -> false

Spend past 2 days trying to hunt down a bug...
I forgot `0` evaluates as `false` so this statement always returned `false` if `id` was `0` >.>

Kids:
if(true)
{
}

Adults:
if(!false)
{
}

Legend:
if(!false && true)
{
}

Came across a method in the code base that returns a boolean.

It uses a ternary operator which returns true if the result is true and false.. you guessed it... if the result is false.

WHY NOT JUST RETURN THE FUCKING RESULT!!!

What. The. F#%#....

How to deal with legacy code when you see such thing:

if function() == !!!false

1. Ctrl+A
2. Del
3. rm -rfv /

//How To Don't Get Spoilers

<?php
$newGoTEp;
$seen;
do {
turnOffInternet();
} while ($newGoTEp == true && seen == false);
?>

😂😂😂

if false? if false what? (false is just not defined, but this is the sort of shit I come across in the twig-theme-saas world, makes me angry)

#define TRUE FALSE
//Happy debugging suckers

!false

It's funny cause it's true!

0.1 + 0.2 === 0.3 // false
- You know nothing JS...

Helped somebody learning Arduino (he is new to programming in general)...

I saw this at the top of his file...
I admire his effort tho...

PSA: negate your tests and make sure they fail!

I have what I thought was a weird and slightly paranoid habit. When I write tests sometimes just as a sanity check negate the assertion to make sure the test fails and isn't a false positive. Almost always fails as expected.

But not today! Turns out I had forgotten to wrap my equality check in an assertion so it would always pass. It freaks me out to imagine pushing a test that always passes not just because it doesn't do its job, but could also obscure a bug and trick me into thinking it works differently than it does. Broken tests are the worst!

But it pays to be paranoid.

//Girlfriend asks question
If(answer != desiredanswer){
return false;
}

[Property=ShowerThoughts,Downvote=false]

return in_array($boolean, [true, false]); //LOL

JS be like:

0 == "0" | true
0 == [] |true

ok... so "0" equals []?

"0" == [] | FALSE

function isBool(input) {
return (mixed_var === true || mixed_var === false);
}

at least this crap wasn't used anywhere in the code base

#gemoftheday #wtf

So they are back, wanting another quick PR approved.
The PR:

```
let isDisabled = switch quantity > 0 {
| true =>
switch value !== "" {
| true => false
| false =>
switch inputStatus {
| Valid =>
switch inputData {
| Ok(a) => a !== 0.0 ? false : true
| Error(_) => true
}
| _ => true
}
}
| false => true
}
```

Everybody relax! False alarm! The website wasn't down, I was still connected to the VPN.

Just found this gem:

<a href="..." onclick="if (! confirm("Are you sure you want to log out?")) return false;">Log out</a>

At first it seemed harsh, but then I learned that he committed code like

if (a == b)
return true;
else
return false;

just came across the code line as below.

#define TRUE FALSE

and than......😂😂

typeof NaN === typeof NaN //false

Why?

Its true unless its javascript, then its false. What the fuck is this? Someone got explanation?

Let me tell you a joke: !false

I just leave it there.

public enum FileType {
True, False
}

I’m so done of getting false errors in Visual Studio

bool isTrue(bool val){
If(val == true){
return true;
}
else if(val == false){
return false;
}
else{
cout<<"Wrong value";
}
Function isTrue is the future ! 😂😂😂

When a programmer plays truth or false, you know he/she will always say true.

This is so TRUE!

Or is it FALSE?

Happy Halloween!

Intern: "Is the keyword to allow nullable 'null=True' "
No. It's farnswaggle=False.

tfw a true/false field in the database is set to char instead of boolean.

Found this in production code.

For those who doesn’t understand Delphi:
switch (some boolean) {
case false:
// some code
default:
// some code
}

Why would anyone use -1 for true and 0 for false in a database.

Booleans people!!! FFS

Making migration of old project a real PITA

What is NaN?
Baby, don't undefined me...
Don't null me...
No false.

Did you hear the one about !false It's funny coz it's true.

var false = true;

The worst thing is a false positive.

True or False?

Again found myself before deadline. My excuse? I'm more productive during the deadline rush :D
How everyone else sees it: you fucked up
What do I say to myself: never again!!!
```
sleep(until_next_deadline);
goto begining_of_this_post;
```

javaScript:

0 == "0" // true
0 // false
"0" // true

o.0

True = ((True === False) == False)

End result, true is true

The hell you mean maybe ???

def maybe
[true, false].sample
end

You have got to be kidding me...

successful = false;
return successful;

Because returning true or false is too mainstream

boolean experience = false;
boolean get_a_job;

while(!experience){

get_a_job = false;

while(!get_a_job){

experience = false;

while(!experience){

get_a_job = false;

.....

«To infinity and beyond!»

Skynet 😎 **evil laugh**

Or at least, an AI that can detect and emulate emotions, including sarcasm. Without errors or false results 😐

if (smart === false) {
system32.delete();
} else if (smart === true) {
system32.DEMOLISH();
}

MUAHAHAH

LicenseManager(){this.licensed=false;this.licenseCached=false}

change false to true

and Vysor Beta is PRO!! cracking was so simple ahahahaha OMG Fuck

just found a build in function in a certain framework.
that function has a parameter named
"fail_silently".
func(fail_silently=False)
made me laugh.
and my laugh function was like.
laugh_func(laugh_silently=False)
😆😁

I hate complex boolean logic.

(true||false) && true || false || (true && false) ... etc (continue for at least ten clauses four times as long)

mongpoop

this is how our upgrade from mongoose v5 to v6 went

v5: strictQuery is false by default

v6: strictQuery is true be default

^ realized this once our update went live, we are now manually migrating several hundreds of production data.

v7: strictQuery is false by default.

what!!!

looking at this resumee. not sure if i want to buy it 🤔

Failed asserting that false is true.

No shit sherlock ;/

return not not False

It's funny it's !false

ifnt (False):
//Don't something
elsifnt(True)
//Do something
elsent
//somethingn't

allUpperCase = true
for char in rant.message:
if !isUpperCase(char):
allUpperCase = false

if allUpperCase:
rant.category = "rant"
else:
rant.category = "!rant"

my C# dream:

if (Object.Property != null)
wouldn't produce an exception if the obejct is null but just equal to false

Just got intern to “help me” on project. Told him to install nodeJs and run ‘npm install’ inside project folder that he pulled from git.

He ended up running ‘npm install’ inside C:\Program Files (x86)\nodejs

Don’t have slightest clue how he got this idea, ... I just wanted to smash my head through window by that point. Similar shit repeated whole day long.

To all guys who write shitty code:
if (false)

I just found that when compiling for Release mode in Visual Studio the JIT compiler eliminates this:
Dead code elimination - A statement like if (false) { /.../ } gets completely eliminated.
And a lot of other similar stuff

var dayInMyLife = function(data) {
var checkDevRant = setInterval(function() { openDevRant(); }, Math.random()*10000),
workday = (data.day.toLowerCase() == 'saturday' || data.day.toLowerCase() == 'sunday' || data.holiday == true) ? false : true;
if (workday) {
var schedule = {
'wakeup': '06:45',
'travelToWork': {
'time': '07:10',
'method': 'walking'
},
'lunch': '11.00',
'travelToHome': {
'time': '15:30',
'method': 'walking'
}
};
while (atWork) {
keepZeroInbox();
beAmongDinosaurs();
if (checkForProjects()) {
doProject();
};
while (noisyCoworkers) {
useNoiseCancellationHeadset();
};
};
spendPreciousFreeTimeWithFamily();
enterSleepMode();
}
}
var today = dayInMyLife({'day': 'monday', 'holiday': false});

I hate complicated and out of date documentation!!!

if (me == angryClickityClackity) {
headButtKeyboard = True;
}else{
headButtKeyboard = false;
}

Some managers think if one woman can deliver a baby in 9 months, then two can deliver a baby in 4 and a half...

[] === [] // false
[] == [] // false

Ffs Javascript!

#define true false;

Yes, No No, it is true... Are you sure?

myCheckbox.isChecked = myboolean--> weirds bugs

myCheckbox.isChecked = myboolean ? true : false --> All weirds bugs fixed

\o/ Thank's Visual Studio for spending time \o/

value is some boolean variable

if( !(value != false) == true) {
return !value;
}

var gotGud = false;

while(!gotGud)
{
try
{
makeCode();
gotGud = true;
}
catch(AbilityException ex) { }
}

function foo (bar){
bar = bar || false
}

Before ES6, still using

$(this).parents(".parent-div").find(".input:not(:checked)").prop("checked", false);

True story.

Snartsheet requires checkbox values of "true" or "false"

Microsoft Flow only passes booleans as "True" and "False" so the API rejects the data.

$a = -1;
if ($a) {
return true;
}
else {
return false;
}

true or false?